IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210875.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Idar Johan Brekke
  • Lars Håland Puntervoll
  • Peter Bank Pedersen
  • John Kellett
  • Mikkel Brabrand

Abstract

Background: Vital signs, i.e. respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, pulse, blood pressure and temperature, are regarded as an essential part of monitoring hospitalized patients. Changes in vital signs prior to clinical deterioration are well documented and early detection of preventable outcomes is key to timely intervention. Despite their role in clinical practice, how to best monitor and interpret them is still unclear. Objective: To evaluate the ability of vital sign trends to predict clinical deterioration in patients hospitalized with acute illness. Data Sources: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and CINAHL were searched in December 2017. Study Selection: Studies examining intermittently monitored vital sign trends in acutely ill adult patients on hospital wards and in emergency departments. Outcomes representing clinical deterioration were of interest. Data Extraction: Performed separately by two authors using a preformed extraction sheet. Results: Of 7,366 references screened, only two were eligible for inclusion. Both were retrospective cohort studies without controls. One examined the accuracy of different vital sign trend models using discrete-time survival analysis in 269,999 admissions. One included 44,531 medical admissions examining trend in Vitalpac Early Warning Score weighted vital signs. They stated that vital sign trends increased detection of clinical deterioration. Critical appraisal was performed using evaluation tools. The studies had moderate risk of bias, and a low certainty of evidence. Additionally, four studies examining trends in early warning scores, otherwise eligible for inclusion, were evaluated. Conclusions: This review illustrates a lack of research in intermittently monitored vital sign trends. The included studies, although heterogeneous and imprecise, indicates an added value of trend analysis. This highlights the need for well-controlled trials to thoroughly assess the research question.

Suggested Citation

  • Idar Johan Brekke & Lars Håland Puntervoll & Peter Bank Pedersen & John Kellett & Mikkel Brabrand, 2019. "The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical deterioration: A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210875
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210875
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210875
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210875&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210875?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.