Author
Listed:
- Ariana M Levin
- Jasmine H Francis
- Molly McFadden
- Scott Brodie
- Y Pierre Gobin
- David H Abramson
Abstract
Importance: Predictions of visual outcomes are useful in clinical and family decisions regarding treatment for retinoblastoma. Very little has been published on the association of post-treatment visual acuity with pre-treatment electroretinography (ERG), which can be performed on infants too young to reliably quantify visual acuity. Objective: To report associations of pre-treatment ERG with post-treatment visual acuity in eyes with advanced retinoblastoma treated with ophthalmic artery chemosurgery (OAC). Design: Retrospective case-control study of eyes treated from 2006 through 2017, with mean follow-up of 51 months (range 2.3–150 months). Setting: Single large academic center. Participants: Group D and E eyes treated with OAC at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center with recorded visual acuity and ERG (30Hz flicker). Main outcome and measure: Snellen visual acuity (uncorrected) compared to initial 30Hz flicker ERG. Results: This study included 157 Group D and E eyes. Results of the Jonckheere-Terpstra test for trend were statistically significant and indicated that eyes with lower pre-treatment ERG readings tended to have more visual impairment post-treatment. Among eyes with initial ERG 75+ μV, 11 of 32 eyes (34%) had visual acuity 20/40 or better. Among eyes with ERG 0 μV, 44 of 46 (96%) had visual acuity of 20/200 or worse. Conclusions and relevance: Eyes with advanced intraocular retinoblastoma treated with OAC can achieve excellent visual acuity, but poor ERG at initial visit is associated with poor visual acuity after treatment in the majority of eyes. Expectations regarding visual potential may influence decisions about treatment.
Suggested Citation
Ariana M Levin & Jasmine H Francis & Molly McFadden & Scott Brodie & Y Pierre Gobin & David H Abramson, 2019.
"Association of electroretinography with visual outcomes after ophthalmic artery chemosurgery for retinoblastoma in ICRb D and E eyes,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-6, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0210647
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210647
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210647. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.