Author
Listed:
- Jordi Casal
- Claude Saegerman
- Stéphane Bertagnoli
- Gilles Meyer
- Jean Pierre Ganière
- Philippe Caufour
- Kris De Clercq
- Philippe Jacquiet
- Claire Hautefeuille
- Florence Etore
- Sebastián Napp
Abstract
A simple method to estimate the size of the vaccine bank needed to control an epidemic of an exotic infectious disease in case of introduction into a country is presented. The method was applied to the case of a Lumpy Skin disease (LSD) epidemic in France. The size of the stock of vaccines needed was calculated based on a series of simple equations that use some trigonometric functions and take into account the spread of the disease, the time required to obtain good vaccination coverage and the cattle density in the affected region. Assuming a 7-weeks period to vaccinate all the animals and a spread of the disease of 7.3 km/week, the vaccination of 740 716 cattle would be enough to control an epidemic of LSD in France in 90% of the simulations (608 196 cattle would cover 75% of the simulations). The results of this simple method were then validated using a dynamic simulation model, which served as reference for the calculation of the vaccine stock required. The differences between both models in different scenarios, related with the time needed to vaccinate the animals, ranged from 7% to 10.5% more vaccines using the simple method to cover 90% of the simulations, and from 9.0% to 13.8% for 75% of the simulations. The model is easy to use and may be adapted for the control of different diseases in different countries, just by using some simple formulas and few input data.
Suggested Citation
Jordi Casal & Claude Saegerman & Stéphane Bertagnoli & Gilles Meyer & Jean Pierre Ganière & Philippe Caufour & Kris De Clercq & Philippe Jacquiet & Claire Hautefeuille & Florence Etore & Sebastián Nap, 2019.
"A simple method to estimate the number of doses to include in a bank of vaccines. The case of Lumpy Skin Disease in France,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, January.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0210317
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210317
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210317. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.