IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0210239.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strict adherence to evidence-based protocol in choice of implants and surgical technique leads to fewer hip fracture reoperations

Author

Listed:
  • Elvira R Flikweert
  • Ronald L Diercks
  • Gerbrand J Izaks
  • Klaus W Wendt
  • Martin Stevens
  • Inge H F Reininga

Abstract

Background and purpose: Surgery for hip fractures is frequently followed by complications that hinder the rehabilitation. Only part of the complications are surgery-related, however these, including reoperation may have the highest impact. Operative protocols are designed to treat all patients equally, according to evidence based guidelines. Aim of this study was to investigate the association between strict adherence to an operative protocol and postoperative complications, especially reoperations. Materials and methods: A retrospective analyses of a prospective cohort. The cohort included all patients aged ≥60 treated for a hip fracture at University Medical Center Groningen between July 2009 and June 2013. The files of the patients were searched for complications, including reoperations. To evaluate adherence to the operative protocol all X-rays were retrospectively reviewed and the fracture type was reclassified. This retrospective fracture classification was compared with the treatment method used. Logistic regression analyses were used to assess whether patients that were not treated strictly according to the operative protocol have higher odds of developing a complication or of undergoing a reoperation. Results: The study population consisted of 479 patients with a mean age of 78.4 (SD 9.5) years. Reoperation was performed in 11% of the patients during the follow-up period. The operative protocol was not followed strictly in 12% of the patients. When the operative protocol was not followed, the odds of having a reoperation was 2.41 times higher (p = 0.02). The overall complication rate was 75% and did not differ in both groups. Conclusion: Strict adherence to an evidence-based operative protocol is of major importance toward preventing implant-related problems and reoperations

Suggested Citation

  • Elvira R Flikweert & Ronald L Diercks & Gerbrand J Izaks & Klaus W Wendt & Martin Stevens & Inge H F Reininga, 2019. "Strict adherence to evidence-based protocol in choice of implants and surgical technique leads to fewer hip fracture reoperations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210239
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210239
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0210239&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0210239?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0210239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.