Author
Listed:
- Jan-Oliver Neumann
- Benito Campos
- Bilal Younes
- Martin Jakobs
- Christine Jungk
- Christopher Beynon
- Andreas von Deimling
- Andreas Unterberg
- Karl Kiening
Abstract
Background: Frame-based stereotactic biopsy (FBSB) is a minimally-invasive and effective procedure for the diagnosis of brain lesions and will likely gain clinical importance. Since FBSB procedures comprise a variety of imaging and sampling methods, it is necessary to compare the safety and effectiveness of individual techniques. Objective: To assess the safety and effectiveness of FBSB using 1.5T iMRI as a one-stop procedure under general anesthesia without intraoperative histological examination. Methods: In this single-center, retrospective analysis, 500 consecutive FBSBs using iMRI were compared to a historic control of 100 biopsies with traditional workflows (computed tomography (CT) with MRI image fusion). All procedures were performed under general anesthesia. Data on surgical procedures, pre- and postoperative neurologic patient status, complications and diagnostic yield were extracted from clinical records. Results: Complication rates and diagnostic yield showed no significant differences between both groups. Mortality was 0.6%, 95% CI = [0.12%, 1.74%], in the iMRI and 0.0% [0.00%, 3.62%], in the control group with a morbidity of 5.4% [3.6%, 7.8%] and 6.0% [2.2%, 12.6%] and a diagnostic yield of 96.8% [94.9%, 98.2%] and 96.0% [90.1%, 98.9%]. Mean procedure duration was 124 [121, 127] minutes using iMRI and 112 [106, 118] minutes in the control group. Conclusion: FBSB using 1.5T iMRI under general anesthesia is a safe and effective procedure and is equivalent to traditional stereotactic workflows with respect to complication rate and diagnostic yield.
Suggested Citation
Jan-Oliver Neumann & Benito Campos & Bilal Younes & Martin Jakobs & Christine Jungk & Christopher Beynon & Andreas von Deimling & Andreas Unterberg & Karl Kiening, 2018.
"Frame-based stereotactic biopsies using an intraoperative MR-scanner are as safe and effective as conventional stereotactic procedures,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0205772
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205772
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0205772. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.