IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: Systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance

Author

Listed:
  • Albert M Isaacs
  • Jay Riva-Cambrin
  • Daniel Yavin
  • Aaron Hockley
  • Tamara M Pringsheim
  • Nathalie Jette
  • Brendan Cord Lethebe
  • Mark Lowerison
  • Jarred Dronyk
  • Mark G Hamilton

Abstract

Background: Hydrocephalus is a debilitating disorder, affecting all age groups. Evaluation of its global epidemiology is required for healthcare planning and resource allocation. Objectives: To define age-specific global prevalence and incidence of hydrocephalus. Methods: Population-based studies reporting prevalence of hydrocephalus were identified (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Google Scholar (1985–2017)). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. Two authors reviewed abstracts, full text articles and abstracted data. Metanalysis and meta-regressions were used to assess associations between key variables. Heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed. Main outcome of interest was hydrocephalus prevalence among pediatric (≤ 18 years), adults (19–64 years), and elderly (≥ 65) patients. Annual hydrocephalus incidence stratified by country income level and folate fortification requirements were obtained (2003–2014) from the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR). Results: Of 2,460 abstracts, 52 met review eligibility criteria (aggregate population 171,558,651). Mean hydrocephalus prevalence was 85/100,000 [95% CI 62, 116]. The prevalence was 88/100,000 [95% CI 72, 107] in pediatrics; 11/100,000 [95% CI 5, 25] in adults; and 175/100,000 [95% CI 67, 458] in the elderly. The ICBDSR-based incidence of hydrocephalus diagnosed at birth remained stable over 11 years: 81/100,000 [95% CI 69, 96]. A significantly lower incidence was identified in high-income countries. Conclusion: This systematic review established age-specific global hydrocephalus prevalence. While high-income countries had a lower hydrocephalus incidence according to the ICBDSR registry, folate fortification status was not associated with incidence. Our findings may inform future healthcare resource allocation and study.

Suggested Citation

  • Albert M Isaacs & Jay Riva-Cambrin & Daniel Yavin & Aaron Hockley & Tamara M Pringsheim & Nathalie Jette & Brendan Cord Lethebe & Mark Lowerison & Jarred Dronyk & Mark G Hamilton, 2018. "Age-specific global epidemiology of hydrocephalus: Systematic review, metanalysis and global birth surveillance," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204926
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204926
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204926&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.