IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0204202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized-control trials

Author

Listed:
  • Gao Chanchan
  • Su Xiangyu
  • Shi Fangfang
  • Chen Yan
  • Gu Xiaoyi

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Methods: Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science databases were systematically searched on February 26, 2018. Eligible studies were screened according to selection criteria, and two reviewers independently extracted outcome data which included progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate, clinical benefit rate and toxicities. RevMan 5.3 and STATA 11.0 software were used to conduct meta-analysis. Results: Thirteen articles including twelve randomized-control trials fulfilled selection criteria. There was no evidence regarding the existence of publication bias and high-risk bias of quality in the selected studies. In previously endocrine therapy-treated postmenopausal patients with hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer, the PFS (HR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.66–0.91) and ORR (RR = 1.78, 95%CI: 1.35–2.34) of combination therapy group were significantly higher than that from fulvestrant monotherapy group. Besides, a statistically significant difference in PFS was found across the two arms in postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-mutant ctDNA tumor (HR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.39–0.69). Moreover, the risk of adverse events (RR = 1.09, 95%CI: 1.05–1.13), CTCAE≥3 (RR = 1.97, 95%CI: 1.49–2.60) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 4.91, 95%CI: 3.37–7.15) were also significantly different between two treatment groups. Sensitivity analysis showed PLOMA-3 trial was an important factor of heterogeneity. Discussion: Even though the combination of targeted therapy plus fulvestrant improved PFS and increased ORR in advanced breast cancer patients, the toxicities of combination therapy were also higher than fulvestrant monotherapy. Further studies related to inhibitors targeting the specific signaling pathway or receptors are urgently needed, and more efforts concerning precision medicine of targeted therapy plus endocrine therapy should be taken to improve the clinical benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao Chanchan & Su Xiangyu & Shi Fangfang & Chen Yan & Gu Xiaoyi, 2018. "The efficacy and safety of targeted therapy plus fulvestrant in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor positive advanced breast cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized-control trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204202
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204202
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0204202&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0204202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0204202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.