IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203649.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer: A comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI

Author

Listed:
  • Jang Yoo
  • Bom Sahn Kim
  • Jin Chung
  • Hai-Jeon Yoon

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the predictive value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for identifying malignancies involved in the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) in comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI. Methods: We enrolled 90 patients who underwent preoperative delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI between October 2015 and May 2017. We calculated the NAC-Standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) using the following formula: maximum SUV (SUVmax) of the NAC in the malignant breast /SUVmax of the NAC in the contralateral normal breast on early (NAC-SUVRearly) and delayed (NAC-SUVRdelay) phase images. MRI was used to measure the distance between the tumor and NAC and to analyze NAC enhancement patterns. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify significant predictive factors for NAC involvement. Results: Seventeen patients were confirmed to have pathologic NAC involvement. NAC symptoms (p = 0.009), tumor multiplicity (p = 0.006), NAC-SUVRdelay (> 1.23, p = 0.007), and MRI-based tumor-to-NAC distance (≤ 22.0 mm, p = 0.003) were independent predictive factors for NAC involvement. Ten of 76 patients with no clinical NAC symptoms had NAC malignancy. Tumor multiplicity (p = 0.009), tumor-to-NAC distance (≤ 20.0 mm, p = 0.014)), and NAC-SUVRdelay (> 1.23, p = 0.018) had independent predictive value for NAC involvement. Conclusions: Delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT is a useful modality for predicting NAC involvement in breast cancer patients whether or not NAC symptoms are present.

Suggested Citation

  • Jang Yoo & Bom Sahn Kim & Jin Chung & Hai-Jeon Yoon, 2018. "Clinical value of delayed 18F-FDG PET/CT for predicting nipple-areolar complex involvement in breast cancer: A comparison with clinical symptoms and breast MRI," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203649
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203649
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203649
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203649&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203649?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203649. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.