IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203474.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic importance and determinants of uremic pruritus in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: A prospective cohort study

Author

Listed:
  • Hon-Yen Wu
  • Jenq-Wen Huang
  • Wan-Chuan Tsai
  • Yu-Sen Peng
  • Hung-Yuan Chen
  • Ju-Yeh Yang
  • Shih-Ping Hsu
  • Mei-Fen Pai
  • Mei-Ju Ko
  • Kuan-Yu Hung
  • Hsien-Ching Chiu

Abstract

Background: Uremic pruritus is a common and frustrating symptom among patients receiving peritoneal dialysis (PD). This study aimed to examine the prognostic importance of uremic pruritus and to identify the determinants for higher pruritus intensity in PD patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients receiving maintenance PD. A visual analogue scale (VAS) score was used to measure the intensity of uremic pruritus. The composite endpoint of PD technique failure or all-cause death was assessed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. The determinants for the VAS score of uremic pruritus was assessed using a multivariable linear regression model. Results: Among the 85 PD patients, 24 (28%) had uremic pruritus. During a median follow-up of 28.0 months, 12 patients experienced technique failure, and 7 died. We found that a higher VAS score of pruritus intensity was an independent risk factor for technique failure or death (hazard ratio, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.28; P = 0.003) after adjusting for a variety of confounding factors. We also found that a weekly total Kt/V of less than 1.88, a longer duration of dialysis, a higher dietary protein intake, and higher blood levels of intact parathyroid hormone and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were independent determinants of higher VAS scores of pruritus intensity. Conclusions: Our results show that uremic pruritus is an independent risk factor of technique failure and death in patients receiving PD. We also found that a weekly total Kt/V

Suggested Citation

  • Hon-Yen Wu & Jenq-Wen Huang & Wan-Chuan Tsai & Yu-Sen Peng & Hung-Yuan Chen & Ju-Yeh Yang & Shih-Ping Hsu & Mei-Fen Pai & Mei-Ju Ko & Kuan-Yu Hung & Hsien-Ching Chiu, 2018. "Prognostic importance and determinants of uremic pruritus in patients receiving peritoneal dialysis: A prospective cohort study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-12, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203474
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203474
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203474&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203474?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.