IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0203081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Qualitative assessment of facilitators and barriers to HIV programme implementation by community health workers in Mopani district, South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Nireshni Naidoo
  • Nkosinathi Zuma
  • N Sellina Khosa
  • Gert Marincowitz
  • Jean Railton
  • Nthabiseng Matlakala
  • Geoffrey A Jobson
  • Jude O Igumbor
  • James A McIntyre
  • Helen E Struthers
  • Remco P H Peters

Abstract

South Africa has implemented a community-based HIV programme (CBHP) in its primary healthcare (PHC) re-engineering strategy that aims to improve public healthcare delivery. This CBHP is delivered by ward-based outreach teams (WBOTs); provision of community HIV services comprises an important component of this programme. We conducted an exploratory study to determine the facilitators and barriers to successful implementation of this CBHP in rural Mopani District, South Africa. Focus group discussions were conducted with the community health workers (CHWs) and PHC nurses; participant interviews were conducted with community members who access these health services, community leaders, and social workers. We conducted a thematic content analysis and based on the key themes reported, we identified the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, consisting of five domains, as the most appropriate model to interpret our findings. First, in terms of intervention characteristics, community members generally valued the HIV services provided, but the variable needs impacted on programme implementation. Outer setting challenges include inability to meet the need of patients as a result of stigma, non-disclosure of HIV status and social factors. In terms of the inner setting, CHWs were grateful for the equipment and training received but expressed the need for better support of management and the provision of additional resources. With regard to characteristics of the implementers, the CHWs expressed the desire for further training despite reporting having sufficient knowledge to conduct their HIV work. Finally, in terms of the implementation process, the importance of relationship building between CHWs and community members was emphasised. In conclusion, these data underline the positive receipt and potential of the CBHP in this rural district and identify areas to further strengthen the programme. The success and sustainability of the CBHP requires ongoing commitment of resources, training, supervision, and organisational support in order to operate effectively and efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Nireshni Naidoo & Nkosinathi Zuma & N Sellina Khosa & Gert Marincowitz & Jean Railton & Nthabiseng Matlakala & Geoffrey A Jobson & Jude O Igumbor & James A McIntyre & Helen E Struthers & Remco P H Pet, 2018. "Qualitative assessment of facilitators and barriers to HIV programme implementation by community health workers in Mopani district, South Africa," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203081
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0203081&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0203081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Onazi, Olajumoke & Adejumo, Adedeji Olusola & Redwood, Lisa & Okorie, Onuka & Lawal, Oyewole & Azuogu, Benedict & Gidado, Mustapha & Daniel, Olusoji James & Mitchell, Ellen M.H., 2020. "Community health care workers in pursuit of TB: Discourses and dilemmas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0203081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.