IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201645.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prediction of clinically relevant adverse drug events in surgical patients

Author

Listed:
  • Jacqueline M Bos
  • Gerard A Kalkman
  • Hans Groenewoud
  • Patricia M L A van den Bemt
  • Peter A G M De Smet
  • J Elsbeth Nagtegaal
  • Andre Wieringa
  • Gert Jan van der Wilt
  • Cornelis Kramers

Abstract

Background: Risk stratification of hospital patients for adverse drug events would enable targeting patients who may benefit from interventions aimed at reducing drug-related morbidity. It would support clinicians and hospital pharmacists in selecting patients to deliver a more efficient health care service. This study aimed to develop a prediction model that helps to identify patients on the day of hospital admission who are at increased risk of developing a clinically relevant, preventable adverse drug event during their stay on a surgical ward. Methods: Data of the pre-intervention measurement period of the P-REVIEW study were used. This study was designed to assess the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention on clinically relevant, preventable adverse drug events in surgical patients. Thirty-nine variables were evaluated in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively. Model performance was expressed in the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics. Bootstrapping was used for model validation. Results: 6780 admissions of patients at surgical wards were included during the pre-intervention period of the PREVIEW trial. 102 patients experienced a clinically relevant, adverse drug event during their hospital stay. The prediction model comprised five variables: age, number of biochemical tests ordered, heparin/LMWH in therapeutic dose, use of opioids, and use of cardiovascular drugs. The AUROC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83–0.88). The model had a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 73.4%. The positive and negative predictive values were 4.5% and 99.6%, respectively. Bootstrapping generated parameters in the same boundaries. Conclusions: The combined use of a limited set of easily ascertainable patient characteristics can help physicians and pharmacists to identify, at the time of admission, surgical patients who are at increased risk of developing ADEs during their hospital stay. This may serve as a basis for taking extra precautions to ensure medication safety in those patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacqueline M Bos & Gerard A Kalkman & Hans Groenewoud & Patricia M L A van den Bemt & Peter A G M De Smet & J Elsbeth Nagtegaal & Andre Wieringa & Gert Jan van der Wilt & Cornelis Kramers, 2018. "Prediction of clinically relevant adverse drug events in surgical patients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-12, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201645
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201645
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201645
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201645&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201645?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liesbeth B E Bosma & Nienke van Rein & Nicole G M Hunfeld & Ewout W Steyerberg & Piet H G J Melief & Patricia M L A van den Bemt, 2019. "Development of a multivariable prediction model for identification of patients at risk for medication transfer errors at ICU discharge," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-13, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201645. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.