IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0201601.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple PDE5Is use as a marker of decreased overall men’s health: A real-life study

Author

Listed:
  • Davide Oreggia
  • Eugenio Ventimiglia
  • Paolo Capogrosso
  • Luca Boeri
  • Walter Cazzaniga
  • Filippo Pederzoli
  • Francesco Chierigo
  • Federico Dehò
  • Francesco Montorsi
  • Andrea Salonia

Abstract

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is considered a sentinel marker for poor general men’s health status. Severe ED has been associated with poor response to phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) therapy. We sought to assess the association of multiple PDE5Is prescription with the overall patients’ health status. Socio-demographic and clinical variables from 939 consecutive white–European, heterosexual, sexually-active men seeking medical help for ED at same tertiary-referral academic outpatient clinic were analyzed. Health-significant comorbidities were scored with the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Patients have been stratified into naïve and non-naïve according to their history of previous prescriptions of any PDE5I. Every patient completed the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire. Logistic regression models tested the association between patients’ baseline characteristics (thus including previous PDE5Is prescriptions) and the overall health status. Overall, 328 (35%) patients were non-naïve for PDE5Is. Of them, 172 (52%), 99 (30%), and 57 (17%) had been prescribed with 1, 2 or 3 different PDE5Is, respectively. Naïve and non-naïve patients did not differ in terms of age, BMI, baseline ED severity; conversely, non-naïve patients had a higher CCI score. At logistic MVA, the number of PDE5Is prescriptions emerged as an independent predictor of a higher burden of comorbidities regardless of ED severity; the higher the number of PDE5Is prescriptions, the higher the CCI score (OR 1.69, 2.49, and 2.90 for 1, 2 or 3 previous PDE5Is, respectively), after accounting for age, BMI, baseline ED severity and cigarette smoking. More than a third of patients seeking medical help for ED at a single tertiary-referral center were non-naïve for PDE5Is. The increasing number of previous prescriptions of PDE5Is emerged as a worrisome marker of a poorer overall men’s health status regardless of ED severity.

Suggested Citation

  • Davide Oreggia & Eugenio Ventimiglia & Paolo Capogrosso & Luca Boeri & Walter Cazzaniga & Filippo Pederzoli & Francesco Chierigo & Federico Dehò & Francesco Montorsi & Andrea Salonia, 2018. "Multiple PDE5Is use as a marker of decreased overall men’s health: A real-life study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201601
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201601
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201601
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0201601&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0201601?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0201601. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.