IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200720.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prognostic factors for return to work and work disability among colorectal cancer survivors; A systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Chantal M den Bakker
  • Johannes R Anema
  • AnneClaire G N M Zaman
  • Henrika C W de Vet
  • Linda Sharp
  • Eva Angenete
  • Marco E Allaix
  • Rene H J Otten
  • Judith A F Huirne
  • Hendrik J Bonjer
  • Angela G E M de Boer
  • Frederieke G Schaafsma

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer is diagnosed progressively in employed patients due to screening programs and increasing retirement age. The objective of this study was to identify prognostic factors for return to work and work disability in patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: The research protocol was published at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42017049757. A systematic review of cohort and case-control studies in colorectal cancer patients above 18 years, who were employed when diagnosed, and who had a surgical resection with curative intent were included. The primary outcome was return to work or work disability. Potentially prognostic factors were included in the analysis if they were measured in at least three studies. Risk of bias was assessed according to the QUality In Prognosis Studies tool. A qualitative synthesis analysis was performed due to heterogeneity between studies. Quality of evidence was evaluated according to Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Results: Eight studies were included with a follow-up period of 26 up to 520 weeks. (Neo)adjuvant therapy, higher age, and more comorbidities had a significant negative influence on return to work. A previous period of unemployment, extensive surgical resection and postoperative complications significantly increased the risk of work disability. The quality of evidence for these prognostic factors was considered very low to moderate. Conclusion: Health care professionals need to be aware of these prognostic factors to select patients eligible for timely intensified rehabilitation in order to optimize the return to work process and prevent work disability.

Suggested Citation

  • Chantal M den Bakker & Johannes R Anema & AnneClaire G N M Zaman & Henrika C W de Vet & Linda Sharp & Eva Angenete & Marco E Allaix & Rene H J Otten & Judith A F Huirne & Hendrik J Bonjer & Angela G E, 2018. "Prognostic factors for return to work and work disability among colorectal cancer survivors; A systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200720
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200720
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200720
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200720&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200720?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200720. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.