IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0200485.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Yield of testing and treatment for tuberculosis among foreign-born persons during contact investigations in the United States: A semi-systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Parriott
  • Mohsen Malekinejad
  • Amanda P Miller
  • Hacsi Horvath
  • Suzanne M Marks
  • James G Kahn

Abstract

Background: Contact investigation is an important strategy for maintaining control of tuberculosis (TB) in the United States. However, testing and treatment outcomes specifically to foreign-born populations are poorly understood. We reviewed literature on testing and LTBI identified during contact investigations in foreign-born populations living in the US. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed and grey literature using Cochrane systematic review methods. We included studies with adult and adolescent populations that were at least 50% foreign-born. Pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated via inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis, and cumulative proportions were calculated as products of adjacent step proportions. Results: We identified 22 studies published between 1997 and 2014 that included at least 50% foreign-born participants. From studies of predominantly (>90%) foreign-born populations, almost all identified contacts were recruited and had valid test results, and 54.8% (95% CI 45.1–62.5%) of contacts with valid test results tested positive. From studies of majority (50% to 90%) foreign-born populations, 78.4% (95% CI 78.0–78.9%) of identified contacts were recruited, 92.0% (95% CI 91.6–92.3%) of recruited contacts had valid test results, and 38.5% (95% CI 31.9%-44.2%) of persons with valid results tested positive. These proportions varied by test type in studies of predominantly foreign-born populations. For every 1000 contacts identified in predominantly foreign-born populations, we estimate that 535 (95% CI 438 to 625) will test positive, and 354 (95% CI 244 to 453) will complete LTBI treatment. For every 1000 contacts identified in majority foreign-born populations, these estimates are 276 (95% CI 230 to 318), and 134 (95% CI 44 to 264), respectively. Conclusions: Contact investigation is a high yield activity for identifying and treating foreign-born persons with LTBI, but must be complemented by other tuberculosis control activities in order to achieve continued progress toward TB elimination.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Parriott & Mohsen Malekinejad & Amanda P Miller & Hacsi Horvath & Suzanne M Marks & James G Kahn, 2018. "Yield of testing and treatment for tuberculosis among foreign-born persons during contact investigations in the United States: A semi-systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-13, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200485
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0200485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200485
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200485&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0200485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davidow, A.L. & Katz, D. & Ghosh, S. & Blumberg, H. & Tamhane, A. & Sevilla, A. & Reves, R., 2015. "Preventing infectious pulmonary tuberculosis among foreign-born residents of the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(9), pages 81-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0200485. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.