IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0199519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Linke
  • Daniel Link
  • Martin Lames

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the measurement accuracy of the most commonly used tracking technologies in professional team sports (i.e., semi-automatic multiple-camera video technology (VID), radar-based local positioning system (LPS), and global positioning system (GPS)). The position, speed, acceleration and distance measures of each technology were compared against simultaneously recorded measures of a reference system (VICON motion capture system) and quantified by means of the root mean square error RMSE. Fourteen male soccer players (age: 17.4±0.4 years, height: 178.6±4.2 cm, body mass: 70.2±6.2 kg) playing for the U19 Bundesliga team FC Augsburg participated in the study. The test battery comprised a sport-specific course, shuttle runs, and small sided games on an outdoor soccer field. The validity of fundamental spatiotemporal tracking data differed significantly between all tested technologies. In particular, LPS showed higher validity for measuring an athlete’s position (23±7 cm) than both VID (56±16 cm) and GPS (96±49 cm). Considering errors of instantaneous speed measures, GPS (0.28±0.07 m⋅s-1) and LPS (0.25±0.06 m⋅s-1) achieved significantly lower error values than VID (0.41±0.08 m⋅s-1). Equivalent accuracy differences were found for instant acceleration values (GPS: 0.67±0.21 m⋅s-2, LPS: 0.68±0.14 m⋅s-2, VID: 0.91±0.19 m⋅s-2). During small-sided games, lowest deviations from reference measures have been found in the total distance category, with errors ranging from 2.2% (GPS) to 2.7% (VID) and 4.0% (LPS). All technologies had in common that the magnitude of the error increased as the speed of the tracking object increased. Especially in performance indicators that might have a high impact on practical decisions, such as distance covered with high speed, we found >40% deviations from the reference system for each of the technologies. Overall, our results revealed significant between-system differences in the validity of tracking data, implying that any comparison of results using different tracking technologies should be done with caution.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Linke & Daniel Link & Martin Lames, 2018. "Validation of electronic performance and tracking systems EPTS under field conditions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199519
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199519&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0199519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan C Rawstorn & Ralph Maddison & Ajmol Ali & Andrew Foskett & Nicholas Gant, 2014. "Rapid Directional Change Degrades GPS Distance Measurement Validity during Intermittent Intensity Running," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-6, April.
    2. Di Salvo Valter & Collins Adam & McNeill Barry & Cardinale Marco, 2006. "Validation of Prozone ®: A new video-based performance analysis system," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 108-119, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tullio Facchinetti & Rodolfo Metulini & Paola Zuccolotto, 2023. "Filtering active moments in basketball games using data from players tracking systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(1), pages 521-538, June.
    2. Jasper Beernaerts & Bernard De Baets & Matthieu Lenoir & Nico Van de Weghe, 2020. "Spatial movement pattern recognition in soccer based on relative player movements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Jonas Lutz & Daniel Memmert & Dominik Raabe & Rolf Dornberger & Lars Donath, 2019. "Wearables for Integrative Performance and Tactic Analyses: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Eduard Pons & Tomás García-Calvo & Ricardo Resta & Hugo Blanco & Roberto López del Campo & Jesús Díaz García & Juan José Pulido, 2019. "A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: Agreement between systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fernando Manuel Otero-Saborido & Rubén D. Aguado-Méndez & Víctor M. Torreblanca-Martínez & José Antonio González-Jurado, 2021. "Technical-Tactical Performance from Data Providers: A Systematic Review in Regular Football Leagues," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Jonas Lutz & Daniel Memmert & Dominik Raabe & Rolf Dornberger & Lars Donath, 2019. "Wearables for Integrative Performance and Tactic Analyses: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, December.
    3. José E. Teixeira & Pedro Forte & Ricardo Ferraz & Miguel Leal & Joana Ribeiro & António J. Silva & Tiago M. Barbosa & António M. Monteiro, 2021. "Monitoring Accumulated Training and Match Load in Football: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-47, April.
    4. Eduard Pons & Tomás García-Calvo & Ricardo Resta & Hugo Blanco & Roberto López del Campo & Jesús Díaz García & Juan José Pulido, 2019. "A comparison of a GPS device and a multi-camera video technology during official soccer matches: Agreement between systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-12, August.
    5. Andrzejewski Marcin & Pluta Beata & Konefał Marek & Chmura Paweł & Chmura Jan, 2016. "Analysis of the Motor Activities of Professional Polish Soccer Players," Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 23(4), pages 196-201, December.
    6. Manuel Alcantarilla-Pedrosa & David Álvarez-Santana & Sergio Hernández-Sánchez & Angel Yañez-Álvarez & Manuel Albornoz-Cabello, 2021. "Assessment of External Load during Matches in Two Consecutive Seasons Using the Mediacoach ® Video Analysis System in a Spanish Professional Soccer Team: Implications for Injury Prevention," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-10, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.