Author
Listed:
- Kiti Ho
- Xia Wang
- Lei Chen
Abstract
Background: The past decade saw the establishment of pediatric intensive care units (PICU) across China. This occurred in the context of increasing private shares of medical costs. Payment schemes have not kept pace with the increased availability and demand. As a result a substantial number of parents, in the face of financial constraints, choose to withdraw the medical care of children even when recovery is expected. Objective: We set out to describe the experience of one PICU in Changsha, an industrialized city near the center of the country with a population of 7.3 million. Results: During the two-year period 883 patients were admitted to the PICU. One hundred one (11%) patients died during their hospital stay. Of these 69 (68%) died after parents elected to withdraw care. A large proportion (33 out of 69 48%) cited economic factors as a reason behind the decision. Compared with the non-withdrawal group the cases had lower disease severity at admission and on the day of death. On the day of death 34% in the withdrawal group had lower disease severity than at admission, showing clinical improvement. The mean hospital charge for the ICU stay was RMB35,000 (~$5600). Conclusion: A substantial proportion of patients in a Chinese urban PICU died after parents chose to withdraw their care in the face of financial hardship, even while some were showing clinical improvement. The society has an obligation, and, likely, an economic incentive, to share this burden.
Suggested Citation
Kiti Ho & Xia Wang & Lei Chen, 2018.
"Reasons for parental withdrawal of care in a pediatric intensive care unit in China,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-7, July.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0199419
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199419
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199419. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.