IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0199096.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High acceptability of a contraceptive vaginal ring among women in Kigali, Rwanda

Author

Listed:
  • Evelyne Kestelyn
  • Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil
  • Marie Michelle Umulisa
  • Grace Umutoni
  • Alice Uwingabire
  • Lambert Mwambarangwe
  • Mireille Uwineza
  • Stephen Agaba
  • Tania Crucitti
  • Janneke van de Wijgert
  • Thérèse Delvaux
  • for the Ring Plus Study Group

Abstract

Background: Introduction of contraceptive vaginal rings (CVRs) could expand the contraceptive method mix reducing the unmet need for family planning in Rwanda, but data on acceptability of CVRs from low and middle-income countries are lacking. Methods: This study explores acceptability of contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) use in Kigali, Rwanda using a mixed methods approach. We collected quantitative and qualitative data before, during and after conducting a clinical trial, using Case Report Forms, Interviewer Administered Questionnaires, In Depth Interviews and Focus Group Discussions. We analyzed the data using an existing theoretical framework including product attributes, relationship attributes and sexual encounter attributes as well as the contextual environment. Results: Our data showed that initial worries reduced over time with actual ring use and ring insertions and removals were described as easy. Most women did not feel the ring during daily activities, appreciated the lack of perceived negative side effects and the increased lubrication. Relationship attributes and sexual encounter attributes such as sexual comfort played a significant role in ring acceptability of the participants and their partners. The contextual environment including Rwandan cultural norms around sexuality positively influenced the acceptance of the NuvaRing. Overall satisfaction was high. Conclusions: Acceptability of the Nuvaring was high among study participants and represents a promising option that could contribute to lowering the unmet need for family planning in Rwanda.

Suggested Citation

  • Evelyne Kestelyn & Jennifer Ilo Van Nuil & Marie Michelle Umulisa & Grace Umutoni & Alice Uwingabire & Lambert Mwambarangwe & Mireille Uwineza & Stephen Agaba & Tania Crucitti & Janneke van de Wijgert, 2018. "High acceptability of a contraceptive vaginal ring among women in Kigali, Rwanda," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199096
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199096
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0199096&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0199096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0199096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.