IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0198586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient big data assimilation through sparse representation: A 3D benchmark case study in petroleum engineering

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaodong Luo
  • Tuhin Bhakta
  • Morten Jakobsen
  • Geir Nævdal

Abstract

Data assimilation is an important discipline in geosciences that aims to combine the information contents from both prior geophysical models and observational data (observations) to obtain improved model estimates. Ensemble-based methods are among the state-of-the-art assimilation algorithms in the data assimilation community. When applying ensemble-based methods to assimilate big geophysical data, substantial computational resources are needed in order to compute and/or store certain quantities (e.g., the Kalman-gain-type matrix), given both big model and data sizes. In addition, uncertainty quantification of observational data, e.g., in terms of estimating the observation error covariance matrix, also becomes computationally challenging, if not infeasible. To tackle the aforementioned challenges in the presence of big data, in a previous study, the authors proposed a wavelet-based sparse representation procedure for 2D seismic data assimilation problems (also known as history matching problems in petroleum engineering). In the current study, we extend the sparse representation procedure to 3D problems, as this is an important step towards real field case studies. To demonstrate the efficiency of the extended sparse representation procedure, we apply an ensemble-based seismic history matching framework with the extended sparse representation procedure to a 3D benchmark case, the Brugge field. In this benchmark case study, the total number of seismic data is in the order of O ( 10 6 ). We show that the wavelet-based sparse representation procedure is extremely efficient in reducing the size of seismic data, while preserving the salient features of seismic data. Moreover, even with a substantial data-size reduction through sparse representation, the ensemble-based seismic history matching framework can still achieve good estimation accuracy.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaodong Luo & Tuhin Bhakta & Morten Jakobsen & Geir Nævdal, 2018. "Efficient big data assimilation through sparse representation: A 3D benchmark case study in petroleum engineering," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(7), pages 1-32, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198586
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198586
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198586&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0198586?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduardo Barrela & Philippe Berthet & Mario Trani & Olivier Thual & Corentin Lapeyre, 2023. "Four-Dimensional History Matching Using ES-MDA and Flow-Based Distance-to-Front Measurement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Guo, Zixi & Zhao, Jinzhou & You, Zhenjiang & Li, Yongming & Zhang, Shu & Chen, Yiyu, 2021. "Prediction of coalbed methane production based on deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Xiaodong Luo, 2019. "Ensemble-based kernel learning for a class of data assimilation problems with imperfect forward simulators," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-40, July.
    4. William Chalub Cruz & Xiaodong Luo & Kurt Rachares Petvipusit, 2022. "Joint History Matching of Multiple Types of Field Data in a 3D Field-Scale Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0198586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.