IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197888.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Umbilical cord blood bilirubins, gestational age, and maternal race predict neonatal hyperbilirubinemia

Author

Listed:
  • Adrian Castillo
  • Tristan R Grogan
  • Grace H Wegrzyn
  • Karrie V Ly
  • Valencia P Walker
  • Kara L Calkins

Abstract

Objective: No validated biomarker at birth exists to predict which newborns will develop severe hyperbilirubinemia. This study’s primary aim was to build and validate a prediction model for severe hyperbilirubinemia using umbilical cord blood bilirubins (CBB) and risk factors at birth in neonates at risk for maternal-fetal blood group incompatibility. This study’s secondary aim was to compare the accuracy of CBB to the direct antigen titer. Methods: Inclusion criteria for this prospective cohort study included: ≥35 weeks gestational age, mother with blood type O and/or Rh negative or positive antibody screen, and 95th and >75th percentile during the initial hospital stay. The predictive performance and accuracy of the two tests (CBB and direct antigen titer) for each outcome was assessed using area under a receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Results: When compared to neonates who did not receive phototherapy (n = 463), neonates who received phototherapy (n = 36) had a greater mean CBB ± standard deviation (2.5 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.4 mg/dL, p 95th and >75th percentile, respectively. The AUC ± standard error (95% confidence interval) for CBB for phototherapy and a total serum bilirubin concentration >95th and >75th percentile was 0.89 ± 0.03 (0.82–0.95), 0.81 ± 0.04 (0.73–0.90), and 0.84 ± 0.02 (0.80–0.89), respectively. However, the AUC for gestational age and maternal Asian race for these outcomes was only 0.55 ± 0.05 (0.45–0.66), 0.66 ± 0.05 (0.56–0.76), and 0.57 ± 0.04 (0.05–0.64), respectively. When the CBB was combined with gestational age and maternal Asian race, the AUC for a total serum bilirubin concentration >95th percentile improved to 0.87 ± 0.03 (0.81–0.92) (p = 0.034 vs. the model with CBB only and p

Suggested Citation

  • Adrian Castillo & Tristan R Grogan & Grace H Wegrzyn & Karrie V Ly & Valencia P Walker & Kara L Calkins, 2018. "Umbilical cord blood bilirubins, gestational age, and maternal race predict neonatal hyperbilirubinemia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197888
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197888
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197888
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197888&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197888?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197888. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.