IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0197769.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Weight estimation for children aged 6 to 59 months in limited-resource settings: A proposal for a tape using height and mid-upper arm circumference

Author

Listed:
  • Mark E Ralston
  • Mark A Myatt

Abstract

Importance: A simple, reliable tool for rapid estimation of weight in children would be useful in limited-resource settings where current weight estimation tools are not reliable, nearly all global under-five mortality occurs, severe acute malnutrition is a significant contributor in approximately one-third of under-five mortality, and a weight scale may not be immediately available to healthcare professionals including first-response providers. Objective: To test the accuracy and precision of an existing weight estimation tool based on patient height and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) in children between six months and five years of age in low-to-middle income countries. Design: Data were collected in 2,434 nutritional surveys during 1992–2017 using a modified Expanded Program of Immunization two-stage cluster design. Setting: Locations in 51 low-to-middle income countries with high prevalence of acute and chronic malnutrition. Participants: Of 1,848,979 children enrolled in the surveys, a total of 1,800,322 children met inclusion criteria (age 6–59 months; weight ≤ 25 kg; MUAC 80–200 mm) and exclusion criterion (bilateral pitting edema and biologically implausible measurements based on WHO flagging criteria). Exposures: Weight was estimated by a regression procedure using database height and MUAC. Main outcomes and measures: Mean percentage difference between true and estimated weight (MPD), proportion of estimates accurate to within ± 10% and ± 20% of true weight (PW10 and PW20), weighted Kappa statistic, and Bland-Altman bias (bias) were reported as measures of tool accuracy. Standard deviation (SD) of the MPD and Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement (LOA) were reported as measures of tool precision. Results: The height model fitted for MUAC classes was accurate and precise. MPD was +0.67% (SD = 9.95%); PW10/PW20 were 68.31% (95% CI 68.24%, 68.38%)/94.73% (95% CI 94.69%, 94.76%); and bias (LOA) were +0.06 kg (-1.97 kg; +2.10 kg). For MUAC 125 mm, PW10/PW20 were 69.93% (95% CI 69.86%, 70.00%)/95.27% (95% CI 95.24%, 95.30%); and bias (LOA) were +0.05 kg (-2.04 kg; +2.13 kg). Conclusions and relevance: An updated model estimating weight from height and MUAC in a large database of children aged 6 to 59 months across a wide range of low-to-middle income countries with high prevalence of acute and chronic malnutrition was confirmed to be accurate and precise. A height-based weight estimation tape stratified according to MUAC classes is proposed for children aged 6–59 months in limited-resource settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark E Ralston & Mark A Myatt, 2018. "Weight estimation for children aged 6 to 59 months in limited-resource settings: A proposal for a tape using height and mid-upper arm circumference," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197769
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197769
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197769
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0197769&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0197769?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0197769. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.