IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0195805.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The complexity of patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine wards evaluated by FADOI-COMPLIMED score(s). A hypothetical approach

Author

Listed:
  • Erminio Bonizzoni
  • Gualberto Gussoni
  • Giancarlo Agnelli
  • Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
  • Moira Bonfanti
  • Franco Mastroianni
  • Marco Candela
  • Carlotta Franchi
  • Stefania Frasson
  • Antonio Greco
  • Micaela La Regina
  • Roberta Re
  • Giorgio Vescovo
  • Mauro Campanini

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to develop a new predictive model to measure complexity of patients in medical wards. Setting: 29 Internal Medicine departments in Italy. Materials and methods: The study cohort was made of 541 consecutive patients hospitalized for any cause, aged more than 40 years and with at least two chronic diseases. First, we applied a hierarchical cluster analysis and the principal component analysis (PCA) to a panel of questionnaires [comorbidity (Charlson, CIRS), clinical stability (MEWS), social frailty (Flugelman), cognitive dysfunction (SPSMQ), depression (5-item GDS), functional dependence (ADL, IADL, Barthel), risk of sore threats (Exton-Smith scale), nutrition (MNA), pain (NRPS), adherence to therapy (Morisky scale)], in order to select domains informative for the definition of complexity. The following step was to create the score(s) needed to quantify it. Results: Two main clusters were identified: the first includes 7 questionnaires whose common denominator is dependence and frailty, the second consists of 3 questionnaires representative of comorbidity. Globally, they account for about 70% of the total variance (55.2% and 13.8%, respectively). The first principal component was simplified in “Complimed Score 1” (CS1) as a recalibrated average between the Barthel Index and the Exton Smith score, whereas the second cluster was approximated to “Complimed Score 2” (CS2), by using the Charlson score only. Conclusions: Complexity is a two-dimensional clinical phenomenon. The FADOI-Complimed Score(s) is a new tool useful for the routine evaluation of complexity in medical patients, simple to use and taking around 10 minutes to complete.

Suggested Citation

  • Erminio Bonizzoni & Gualberto Gussoni & Giancarlo Agnelli & Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi & Moira Bonfanti & Franco Mastroianni & Marco Candela & Carlotta Franchi & Stefania Frasson & Antonio Greco & Mic, 2018. "The complexity of patients hospitalized in Internal Medicine wards evaluated by FADOI-COMPLIMED score(s). A hypothetical approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195805
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195805
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195805&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0195805?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.