IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0195426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diabetic retinopathy screening in incident diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany between 2004 and 2013 - A prospective cohort study based on health claims data

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Kreft
  • Myra B McGuinness
  • Gabriele Doblhammer
  • Robert P Finger

Abstract

Objective: To assess factors associated with diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening uptake following a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (type 2 diabetes) in Germany. Materials and methods: A nationally representative prospective sample of individual-level health claims data for 250,000 members from Germany’s largest public insurance provider in 2004–2013 was assessed. In the sample, 26,560 persons with incident type 2 diabetes were identified. Factors associated with subsequent DR screening were assessed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier estimator, and Cox regression analysis. Results: On average 27.6 visits to an ophthalmologist per 100 person-years in persons with incident type 2 diabetes occurred. Half of all incident cases (Kaplan-Meier estimator) had not seen an ophthalmologist after more than two years (2.25 years) following their diabetes diagnosis. In the multivariate analysis, an older age (from hazard ratio HR(70–74) = 0.93 [95%-CI: 0.89–0.97] to HR(90+) = 0.50 [95%-CI: 0.42–0.60] compared to persons aged 50–69 years) and a higher disability level (i.e. HR(disability level 3) = 0.30 [95%-CI: 0.25–0.36]) were associated with a lower likelihood, while female sex (HR = 1.12 [95%-CI: 1.08–1.15]), six or more comorbidities (HR = 1.26 [95%-CI: 1.15–1.37]), moderate (HR = 1.51 [95%-CI: 1.46–1.56]) or severe type 2 diabetes (HR = 1.53 [95%-CI: 1.45–1.61]) as well as being enrolled in a type 2 diabetes disease management program (HR = 1.78 [95%-CI: 1.69–1.87]) were associated with a higher likelihood of DR screening. Conclusions: A high proportion of newly diagnosed persons with type 2 diabetes did not follow current German recommendations for DR screening, impeding timely detection and management of potential complications. This was more apparent among persons who were men, older or had a disability. The uptake of screening was considerably greater among those enrolled in a diseases management program. These factors need to be considered when planning DR screening services and/or referrals.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Kreft & Myra B McGuinness & Gabriele Doblhammer & Robert P Finger, 2018. "Diabetic retinopathy screening in incident diabetes mellitus type 2 in Germany between 2004 and 2013 - A prospective cohort study based on health claims data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-14, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195426
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195426
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0195426&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0195426?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sang-Ho Byun & Seung Hyun Ma & Jae Kwan Jun & Kyu-Won Jung & Boyoung Park, 2013. "Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy and Nephropathy in Patients with Diabetes: A Nationwide Survey in Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mapa Mudiyanselage Prabhath Nishantha Piyasena & Gudlavalleti Venkata S Murthy & Jennifer L Y Yip & Clare Gilbert & Maria Zuurmond & Tunde Peto & Iris Gordon & Suwin Hewage & Sureshkumar Kamalakannan, 2019. "Systematic review on barriers and enablers for access to diabetic retinopathy screening services in different income settings," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-29, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jongnam Hwang, 2016. "Decomposing socioeconomic inequalities in the use of preventive eye screening services among individuals with diabetes in Korea," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 61(5), pages 613-620, June.
    2. Young-Hoon Lee, 2018. "Socioeconomic differences among community-dwelling diabetic adults screened for diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy: The 2015 Korean Community Health Survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0195426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.