IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0194372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Genome-wide analysis of codon usage bias in four sequenced cotton species

Author

Listed:
  • Liyuan Wang
  • Huixian Xing
  • Yanchao Yuan
  • Xianlin Wang
  • Muhammad Saeed
  • Jincai Tao
  • Wei Feng
  • Guihua Zhang
  • Xianliang Song
  • Xuezhen Sun

Abstract

Codon usage bias (CUB) is an important evolutionary feature in a genome which provides important information for studying organism evolution, gene function and exogenous gene expression. The CUB and its shaping factors in the nuclear genomes of four sequenced cotton species, G. arboreum (A2), G. raimondii (D5), G. hirsutum (AD1) and G. barbadense (AD2) were analyzed in the present study. The effective number of codons (ENC) analysis showed the CUB was weak in these four species and the four subgenomes of the two tetraploids. Codon composition analysis revealed these four species preferred to use pyrimidine-rich codons more frequently than purine-rich codons. Correlation analysis indicated that the base content at the third position of codons affect the degree of codon preference. PR2-bias plot and ENC-plot analyses revealed that the CUB patterns in these genomes and subgenomes were influenced by combined effects of translational selection, directional mutation and other factors. The translational selection (P2) analysis results, together with the non-significant correlation between GC12 and GC3, further revealed that translational selection played the dominant role over mutation pressure in the codon usage bias. Through relative synonymous codon usage (RSCU) analysis, we detected 25 high frequency codons preferred to end with T or A, and 31 low frequency codons inclined to end with C or G in these four species and four subgenomes. Finally, 19 to 26 optimal codons with 19 common ones were determined for each species and subgenomes, which preferred to end with A or T. We concluded that the codon usage bias was weak and the translation selection was the main shaping factor in nuclear genes of these four cotton genomes and four subgenomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyuan Wang & Huixian Xing & Yanchao Yuan & Xianlin Wang & Muhammad Saeed & Jincai Tao & Wei Feng & Guihua Zhang & Xianliang Song & Xuezhen Sun, 2018. "Genome-wide analysis of codon usage bias in four sequenced cotton species," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194372
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194372
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0194372&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0194372?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carla L. Saldaña & Julio C. Chávez-Galarza & Germán De la Cruz & Jorge H. Jhoncon & Juan C. Guerrero-Abad & Héctor V. Vásquez & Jorge L. Maicelo & Carlos I. Arbizu, 2022. "Revealing the Complete Chloroplast Genome of an Andean Horticultural Crop, Sweet Cucumber (Solanum muricatum) , and Its Comparison with Other Solanaceae Species," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0194372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.