IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0193047.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insurance status and cancer treatment mediate the association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah C Markt
  • Tianyu Tang
  • Angel M Cronin
  • Ingrid T Katz
  • Brooke E Howitt
  • Neil S Horowitz
  • Larissa J Lee
  • Alexi A Wright

Abstract

Cervical cancer outcomes remain poor among disadvantaged populations, including ethnic minorities, low-income, and underinsured women. The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie the observed association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival. We identified 13,698 women, ages 21 to 64 years, diagnosed with stages I-III primary cervical cancer between 2007–2013 in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated associations between race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, Other) and cervical cancer-specific mortality. We conducted mediation analysis to calculate the mediation proportion and its 95% confidence interval. Non-Hispanic black women had an increased risk of cervical cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08–1.39), and Hispanic women a decreased risk of dying from their disease (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.72–0.93), compared with non-Hispanic white. The estimated proportion of excess cervical cancer mortality for non-Hispanic black women relative to non-Hispanic white women that was mediated by insurance was 18.6% and by treatment was 47.2%. Furthermore, non-Hispanic black women were more likely to receive radiation and less likely to receive surgery for early-stage disease. In this population-based study we found that some of the excess cervical cancer-specific mortality for non-Hispanic black women is mediated by factors such as insurance status and treatment. These findings suggest that enhancing existing insurance coverage and ensuring equal and adequate treatment in all women may be a key strategy for improving cervical cancer outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah C Markt & Tianyu Tang & Angel M Cronin & Ingrid T Katz & Brooke E Howitt & Neil S Horowitz & Larissa J Lee & Alexi A Wright, 2018. "Insurance status and cancer treatment mediate the association between race/ethnicity and cervical cancer survival," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193047
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193047
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0193047&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0193047?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bradley, C.J. & Given, C.W. & Roberts, C., 2004. "Health care disparities and cervical cancer," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(12), pages 2098-2103.
    2. Saroj Fleming & Nicholas H Schluterman & J Katthleen Tracy & Sarah M Temkin, 2014. "Black and White Women in Maryland Receive Different Treatment for Cervical Cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-8, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0193047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.