IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0192802.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Changes of attachment characteristics during psychotherapy of patients with social anxiety disorder: Results from the SOPHO-Net trial

Author

Listed:
  • Bernhard Strauß
  • Uwe Altmann
  • Susanne Manes
  • Anne Tholl
  • Susan Koranyi
  • Tobias Nolte
  • Manfred E Beutel
  • Jörg Wiltink
  • Stephan Herpertz
  • Wolfgang Hiller
  • Jürgen Hoyer
  • Peter Joraschky
  • Björn Nolting
  • Viktoria Ritter
  • Ulrich Stangier
  • Ulrike Willutzki
  • Simone Salzer
  • Eric Leibing
  • Falk Leichsenring
  • Helmut Kirchmann

Abstract

Objectives: Within a randomized controlled trial contrasting the outcome of manualized cognitive-behavioral (CBT) and short term psychodynamic therapy (PDT) compared to a waiting list condition (the SOPHO-Net trial), we set out to test whether self-reported attachment characteristics change during the treatments and if these changes differ between treatments. Research design and methods: 495 patients from the SOPHO-Net trial (54.5% female, mean age 35.2 years) who were randomized to either CBT, PDT or waiting list (WL) completed the partner-related revised Experiences in Close Relationships Questionnaire (ECR-R) before and after treatment and at 6 and 12 months follow-up. The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS) was administered at pre-treatment, post-treatment, and at 6-month and 1-year follow-up. ECR-R scores were first compared to a representative healthy sample (n = 2508) in order to demonstrate that the clinical sample differed significantly from the non-clinical sample with respect to attachment anxiety and avoidance. Results: LSAS scores correlated significantly with both ECR-R subscales. Post-therapy, patients treated with CBT revealed significant changes in attachment anxiety and avoidance whereas patients treated with PDT showed no significant changes. Changes between post-treatment and the two follow-ups were significant in both conditions, with minimal (insignificant) differences between treatments at the 12- month follow-up. Conclusions: The current study supports recent reviews of mostly naturalistic studies indicating changes in attachment as a result of psychotherapy. Although there were differences between conditions at the end of treatment, these largely disappeared during the follow-up period which is line with the other results of the SOPHO-NET trial. Trial registration: Controlled-trials.com ISRCTN53517394

Suggested Citation

  • Bernhard Strauß & Uwe Altmann & Susanne Manes & Anne Tholl & Susan Koranyi & Tobias Nolte & Manfred E Beutel & Jörg Wiltink & Stephan Herpertz & Wolfgang Hiller & Jürgen Hoyer & Peter Joraschky & Björ, 2018. "Changes of attachment characteristics during psychotherapy of patients with social anxiety disorder: Results from the SOPHO-Net trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192802
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0192802&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0192802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0192802. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.