IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0191708.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting outcome of Morris water maze test in vascular dementia mouse model with deep learning

Author

Listed:
  • Akinori Higaki
  • Masaki Mogi
  • Jun Iwanami
  • Li-Juan Min
  • Hui-Yu Bai
  • Bao-Shuai Shan
  • Masayoshi Kukida
  • Harumi Kan-no
  • Shuntaro Ikeda
  • Jitsuo Higaki
  • Masatsugu Horiuchi

Abstract

The Morris water maze test (MWM) is one of the most popular and established behavioral tests to evaluate rodents’ spatial learning ability. The conventional training period is around 5 days, but there is no clear evidence or guidelines about the appropriate duration. In many cases, the final outcome of the MWM seems predicable from previous data and their trend. So, we assumed that if we can predict the final result with high accuracy, the experimental period could be shortened and the burden on testers reduced. An artificial neural network (ANN) is a useful modeling method for datasets that enables us to obtain an accurate mathematical model. Therefore, we constructed an ANN system to estimate the final outcome in MWM from the previously obtained 4 days of data in both normal mice and vascular dementia model mice. Ten-week-old male C57B1/6 mice (wild type, WT) were subjected to bilateral common carotid artery stenosis (WT-BCAS) or sham-operation (WT-sham). At 6 weeks after surgery, we evaluated their cognitive function with MWM. Mean escape latency was significantly longer in WT-BCAS than in WT-sham. All data were collected and used as training data and test data for the ANN system. We defined a multiple layer perceptron (MLP) as a prediction model using an open source framework for deep learning, Chainer. After a certain number of updates, we compared the predicted values and actual measured values with test data. A significant correlation coefficient was derived form the updated ANN model in both WT-sham and WT-BCAS. Next, we analyzed the predictive capability of human testers with the same datasets. There was no significant difference in the prediction accuracy between human testers and ANN models in both WT-sham and WT-BCAS. In conclusion, deep learning method with ANN could predict the final outcome in MWM from 4 days of data with high predictive accuracy in a vascular dementia model.

Suggested Citation

  • Akinori Higaki & Masaki Mogi & Jun Iwanami & Li-Juan Min & Hui-Yu Bai & Bao-Shuai Shan & Masayoshi Kukida & Harumi Kan-no & Shuntaro Ikeda & Jitsuo Higaki & Masatsugu Horiuchi, 2018. "Predicting outcome of Morris water maze test in vascular dementia mouse model with deep learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-12, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0191708
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191708
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0191708
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0191708&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0191708?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Akinori Higaki & Masaki Mogi & Jun Iwanami & Li-Juan Min & Hui-Yu Bai & Bao-Shuai Shan & Harumi Kan-no & Shuntaro Ikeda & Jitsuo Higaki & Masatsugu Horiuchi, 2018. "Recognition of early stage thigmotaxis in Morris water maze test with convolutional neural network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0191708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.