IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0190088.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the validity and consistency of misjudgment of stepping ability in young and older adults

Author

Listed:
  • Nick Kluft
  • Sjoerd M Bruijn
  • Roel H A Weijer
  • Jaap H van Dieën
  • Mirjam Pijnappels

Abstract

Disparities between perceived and actual physical abilities have been shown in older adults and may lead to balance loss or falls. However, it is unclear whether one’s misjudgment is an inherent trait and thus consistent across different tasks, and whether this misjudgment is age-related. We measured the degree of misjudgment in young and older adults on four different stepping tasks; stepping over a raised bar, crossing a declining cord by stepping over it at a self-selected height, crossing a virtual river by stepping over it at a self-selected width, and making a recovery step after release from an inclined position. Before comparison, we carefully checked the validity of the different tasks to determine the misjudgment. No substantial differences were found in the amplitude of the misjudgment between the age groups, and the degree of misjudgment did not transfer across different stepping tasks. However, since only one task (i.e., stepping over a raised bar) met our criteria for validly assessing one’s misjudgment, it remains unclear whether the degree of misjudgment is task-specific or an inherent trait. These findings stress the importance of testing the construct validity of the task, prior to the examination of the misjudgment of stepping ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Nick Kluft & Sjoerd M Bruijn & Roel H A Weijer & Jaap H van Dieën & Mirjam Pijnappels, 2017. "On the validity and consistency of misjudgment of stepping ability in young and older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190088
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190088
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0190088&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0190088?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriela Almeida & Jorge Bravo & Hugo Folgado & Hugo Rosado & Felismina Mendes & Catarina Pereira, 2019. "Reliability and construct validity of the stepping-forward affordance perception test for fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-13, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0190088. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.