IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0189347.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling

Author

Listed:
  • Kwang Hyuck Lee
  • Eun Young Kim
  • Juhee Cho
  • Danbee Kang
  • Seungmin Bang
  • Hyung Kil Kim
  • Gwang Ha Kim
  • Hyun Jong Choi
  • Joung-Ho Han
  • Seong Woo Jeon
  • Ji Kon Ryu
  • Jeong Seop Moon
  • Tae Hee Lee
  • Jin Woong Cho
  • Tae Hyeon Kim
  • Young Koog Cheon
  • Chang-Hwan Park
  • Jong Kyun Lee
  • Jong Ho Moon
  • Chang Min Cho

Abstract

Background and aim: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is commonly used to obtain tissue external to the gastrointestinal tract. EUS-FNA is relatively safe, but occasionally adverse events have been reported. There is scarcity of data on risk factors of adverse events. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with EUS-FNA. Methods: In this multicenter case-control study, we retrospectively reviewed 4,097 cases between 2009 and 2012 at 15 hospitals in Korea. Among the patients there were 104 cases (2.5%) who had adverse events of which 12 (0.29%) were severe. We matched 520 controls (1:5 ratios) stratified by hospital to analyze the potential risk factors. Results: The most common adverse events were pancreatitis (45/104, 43.3%) and infection (46/104, 44.2%). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) on the same day was a risk factor of all adverse events [OR = 2.41, 95% CI (1.41, 4.12)], pancreatitis [OR = 2.31, 95% CI (1.02, 5.25)], and infection [OR = 2.75, 95% CI (1.31, 5.78)]. More than 15 to-and-fro movements during puncture increased the risk of pancreatitis [OR = 2.30, 95% CI (1.11, 4.77)] and infection [OR = 3.65, 95% CI (1.55, 8.59)]. A higher number of punctures was positively correlated with pancreatitis [OR = 1.34, 95% CI (1.08, 1.67)] but negatively correlated with infection [OR = 0.66, 95% CI (0.48, 0.89)]. Conclusions: EUS-FNA is a safe procedure in which serious adverse events are rare. We define some risk factors of adverse events during EUS-FNA, including ERCP on the same day, a higher number of punctures, and more than 15 to-and-fro movements.

Suggested Citation

  • Kwang Hyuck Lee & Eun Young Kim & Juhee Cho & Danbee Kang & Seungmin Bang & Hyung Kil Kim & Gwang Ha Kim & Hyun Jong Choi & Joung-Ho Han & Seong Woo Jeon & Ji Kon Ryu & Jeong Seop Moon & Tae Hee Lee &, 2017. "Risk factors associated with adverse events during endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(12), pages 1-13, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0189347
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189347
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189347
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0189347&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0189347?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0189347. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.