IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0188188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act

Author

Listed:
  • Yvette van der Eijk
  • Stanton A Glantz

Abstract

Using the Truth Tobacco Industry Documents Library and Congressional records, we examined the tobacco industry’s involvement with the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). During legislative drafting of the ADA (1989–1990), the Tobacco Institute, the tobacco industry’s lobbying and public relations arm at the time, worked with industry lawyers and civil rights groups to include smoking in the ADA’s definition of “disability.” Focus was on smoking as a perceived rather than actual disability so that tobacco companies could maintain that smoking is not addictive. Language that would have explicitly excluded smoking from ADA coverage was weakened or omitted. Tobacco Institute lawyers did not think the argument that smokers are “disabled” would convince the courts, so in the two years after the ADA was signed into law, the Tobacco Institute paid a lawyer to conduct media tours, seminars, and write articles to convince employers that hiring only non-smokers would violate the ADA. The ultimate goal of these activities was to deter employers from promoting a healthy, tobacco-free workforce and, more broadly, to promote the social acceptability of smoking. Employers and policy makers need to be aware that tobacco use is not protected by the ADA and should not be misled by tobacco industry efforts to insinuate otherwise.

Suggested Citation

  • Yvette van der Eijk & Stanton A Glantz, 2017. "Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188188
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188188
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188188&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0188188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balbach, E.D. & Barbeau, E.M. & Manteufel, V. & Pan, J., 2005. "Political coalitions for mutual advantage: The case of the tobacco institute's labor management committee," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(6), pages 985-993.
    2. Bialous, S.A. & Fox, B.J. & Glantz, S.A., 2001. "Tobacco industry allegations of "illegal lobbying" and state tobacco control," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(1), pages 62-67.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nixon, Meredith L. BA & Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., 2001. "Tobacco Industry Political Activity and Tobacco Control Policy Making in Washington: 1996-2000," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt3vd3s0hc, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0188188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.