IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0187244.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retest reliability of individual alpha ERD topography assessed by human electroencephalography

Author

Listed:
  • Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo
  • Alejandro Galvao-Carmona
  • María Luisa Benítez Lugo
  • Juan Luis Ruíz-Peña
  • Mónica Borges Guerra
  • Guillermo Izquierdo Ayuso

Abstract

Background: Despite the immense literature related to diverse human electroencephalographic (EEG) parameters, very few studies have focused on the reliability of these measures. Some of the most studied components (i.e., P3 or MMN) have received more attention regarding the stability of their main parameters, such as latency, amplitude or topography. However, spectral modulations have not been as extensively evaluated considering that different analysis methods are available. Results: The latency for alpha ERD showed stable behaviour between two sessions, and the amplitude exhibited an increment (more negative) in the second session. Conclusion: ERD was mainly stable between the two sessions with the exception of amplitude, which exhibited an increment in the second session. Topography exhibits excellent reliability at the group level; however, it exhibits highly heterogeneous behaviour at the individual level. Considering that the P3 was previously evaluated for this group of subjects, a direct comparison of the correlation scores was possible, and it showed that the ERD component is less reliable in individual topography than in the ERP component (P3).

Suggested Citation

  • Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo & Alejandro Galvao-Carmona & María Luisa Benítez Lugo & Juan Luis Ruíz-Peña & Mónica Borges Guerra & Guillermo Izquierdo Ayuso, 2017. "Retest reliability of individual alpha ERD topography assessed by human electroencephalography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-15, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187244
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187244
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187244
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0187244&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0187244?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo & Javier J González-Rosa & Alejandro Galvao-Carmona & Antonio Hidalgo-Muñoz & Mónica Borges & Juan Luis Ruiz Peña & Guillermo Izquierdo, 2013. "Retest Reliability of Individual P3 Topography Assessed by High Density Electroencephalography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-8, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo & Rocío Caballero-Díaz & Rubén Martín-Clemente & Alejandro Galvao-Carmona & Javier J González-Rosa, 2020. "Individual test-retest reliability of evoked and induced alpha activity in human EEG data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Vázquez-Marrufo & Rocío Caballero-Díaz & Rubén Martín-Clemente & Alejandro Galvao-Carmona & Javier J González-Rosa, 2020. "Individual test-retest reliability of evoked and induced alpha activity in human EEG data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-17, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0187244. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.