Author
Listed:
- Hirokazu Kumazaki
- Zachary Warren
- Taro Muramatsu
- Yuichiro Yoshikawa
- Yoshio Matsumoto
- Masutomo Miyao
- Mitsuko Nakano
- Sakae Mizushima
- Yujin Wakita
- Hiroshi Ishiguro
- Masaru Mimura
- Yoshio Minabe
- Mitsuru Kikuchi
Abstract
Recent rapid technological advances have enabled robots to fulfill a variety of human-like functions, leading researchers to propose the use of such technology for the development and subsequent validation of interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Although a variety of robots have been proposed as possible therapeutic tools, the physical appearances of humanoid robots currently used in therapy with these patients are highly varied. Very little is known about how these varied designs are experienced by individuals with ASD. In this study, we systematically evaluated preferences regarding robot appearance in a group of 16 individuals with ASD (ages 10–17). Our data suggest that there may be important differences in preference for different types of robots that vary according to interaction type for individuals with ASD. Specifically, within our pilot sample, children with higher-levels of reported ASD symptomatology reported a preference for specific humanoid robots to those perceived as more mechanical or mascot-like. The findings of this pilot study suggest that preferences and reactions to robotic interactions may vary tremendously across individuals with ASD. Future work should evaluate how such differences may be systematically measured and potentially harnessed to facilitate meaningful interactive and intervention paradigms.
Suggested Citation
Hirokazu Kumazaki & Zachary Warren & Taro Muramatsu & Yuichiro Yoshikawa & Yoshio Matsumoto & Masutomo Miyao & Mitsuko Nakano & Sakae Mizushima & Yujin Wakita & Hiroshi Ishiguro & Masaru Mimura & Yosh, 2017.
"A pilot study for robot appearance preferences among high-functioning individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Implications for therapeutic use,"
PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
Handle:
RePEc:plo:pone00:0186581
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186581
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0186581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.