IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0186045.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?

Author

Listed:
  • Núria Rovira-Asenjo
  • Agnieszka Pietraszkiewicz
  • Sabine Sczesny
  • Tània Gumí
  • Roger Guimerà
  • Marta Sales-Pardo

Abstract

Leadership positions are still stereotyped as masculine, especially in male-dominated fields (e.g., engineering). So how do gender stereotypes affect the evaluation of leaders and team cohesiveness in the process of team development? In our study participants worked in 45 small teams (4–5 members). Each team was headed by either a female or male leader, so that 45 leaders (33% women) supervised 258 team members (39% women). Over a period of nine months, the teams developed specific engineering projects as part of their professional undergraduate training. We examined leaders’ self-evaluation, their evaluation by team members, and team cohesiveness at two points of time (month three and month nine, the final month of the collaboration). While we did not find any gender differences in leaders’ self-evaluation at the beginning, female leaders evaluated themselves more favorably than men at the end of the projects. Moreover, female leaders were evaluated more favorably than male leaders at the beginning of the project, but the evaluation by team members did not differ at the end of the projects. Finally, we found a tendency for female leaders to build more cohesive teams than male leaders.

Suggested Citation

  • Núria Rovira-Asenjo & Agnieszka Pietraszkiewicz & Sabine Sczesny & Tània Gumí & Roger Guimerà & Marta Sales-Pardo, 2017. "Leader evaluation and team cohesiveness in the process of team development: A matter of gender?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(10), pages 1-20, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0186045
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186045
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186045
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0186045&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0186045?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liz Hamui-Sutton & Francisco Paz-Rodriguez & Alejandra Sánchez-Guzmán & Tania Vives-Varela & Teresa Corona, 2023. "Violence and Clinical Learning Environments in Medical Residencies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0186045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.