IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0184666.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Non-pharmacological treatment for depressed older patients in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Floor Holvast
  • Btissame Massoudi
  • Richard C Oude Voshaar
  • Peter F M Verhaak

Abstract

Background: Late-life depression is most often treated in primary care, and it usually coincides with chronic somatic diseases. Given that antidepressants contribute to polypharmacy in these patients, and potentially to interactions with other drugs, non-pharmacological treatments are essential. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to present an overview of the non-pharmacological treatments available in primary care for late-life depression. Method: The databases of PubMed, PsychINFO, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched in January 2017 with combinations of MeSH-terms and free text words for “general practice,” “older adults,” “depression,” and “non-pharmacological treatment”. All studies with empirical data concerning adults aged 60 years or older were included, and the results were stratified by primary care, and community setting. We narratively reviewed the results and performed a meta-analysis on cognitive behavioral therapy in the primary care setting. Results: We included 11 studies conducted in primary care, which covered the following five treatment modalities: cognitive behavioral therapy, exercise, problem-solving therapy, behavioral activation, and bright-light therapy. Overall, the meta-analysis showed a small effect for cognitive behavioral therapy, with one study also showing that bright-light therapy was effective. Another 18 studies, which evaluated potential non-pharmacological interventions in the community suitable for implementation, indicated that bibliotherapy, life-review, problem-solving therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy were effective at short-term follow-up. Discussion: We conclude that the effects of several treatments are promising, but need to be replicated before they can be implemented more widely in primary care. Although more treatment modalities were effective in a community setting, more research is needed to investigate whether these treatments are also applicable in primary care. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42016038442.

Suggested Citation

  • Floor Holvast & Btissame Massoudi & Richard C Oude Voshaar & Peter F M Verhaak, 2017. "Non-pharmacological treatment for depressed older patients in primary care: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184666
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184666
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184666
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184666&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0184666?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa M. Garrido & Robert L. Kane & Merrie Kaas & Rosalie A. Kane, 2009. "Perceived Need for Mental Health Care Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 64(6), pages 704-712.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Páll Biering, 2019. "Helpful approaches to older people experiencing mental health problems: a critical review of models of mental health care," European Journal of Ageing, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 215-225, June.
    2. Yawei Guo & Jingjie Sun & Simeng Hu & Stephen Nicholas & Jian Wang, 2019. "Hospitalization Costs and Financial Burden on Families with Children with Depression: A Cross-Section Study in Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Iris van Venrooij & Jan Spijker & Gerben J. Westerhof & Ruslan Leontjevas & Debby L. Gerritsen, 2019. "Applying Intervention Mapping to Improve the Applicability of Precious Memories, an Intervention for Depressive Symptoms in Nursing Home Residents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    4. Tomasz Zaprutko & Robert Göder & Krzysztof Kus & Wiktor Pałys & Filip Rybakowski & Elżbieta Nowakowska, 2018. "The economic burden of inpatient care of depression in Poznan (Poland) and Kiel (Germany) in 2016," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Susan Caplan & Steven Buyske, 2015. "Depression, Help-Seeking and Self-Recognition of Depression among Dominican, Ecuadorian and Colombian Immigrant Primary Care Patients in the Northeastern United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Terence V McCann & John Bamberg, 2016. "Carers of older adults' satisfaction with public mental health service clinicians: a qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(11-12), pages 1634-1643, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184666. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.