IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0184217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revising the lower statistical limit of x-ray grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography

Author

Listed:
  • Mathias Marschner
  • Lorenz Birnbacher
  • Marian Willner
  • Michael Chabior
  • Julia Herzen
  • Peter B Noël
  • Franz Pfeiffer

Abstract

Phase-contrast x-ray computed tomography (PCCT) is currently investigated as an interesting extension of conventional CT, providing high soft-tissue contrast even if examining weakly absorbing specimen. Until now, the potential for dose reduction was thought to be limited compared to attenuation CT, since meaningful phase retrieval fails for scans with very low photon counts when using the conventional phase retrieval method via phase stepping. In this work, we examine the statistical behaviour of the reverse projection method, an alternative phase retrieval approach and compare the results to the conventional phase retrieval technique. We investigate the noise levels in the projections as well as the image quality and quantitative accuracy of the reconstructed tomographic volumes. The results of our study show that this method performs better in a low-dose scenario than the conventional phase retrieval approach, resulting in lower noise levels, enhanced image quality and more accurate quantitative values. Overall, we demonstrate that the lower statistical limit of the phase stepping procedure as proposed by recent literature does not apply to this alternative phase retrieval technique. However, further development is necessary to overcome experimental challenges posed by this method which would enable mainstream or even clinical application of PCCT.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathias Marschner & Lorenz Birnbacher & Marian Willner & Michael Chabior & Julia Herzen & Peter B Noël & Franz Pfeiffer, 2017. "Revising the lower statistical limit of x-ray grating-based phase-contrast computed tomography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184217
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184217
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0184217&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0184217?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jian Fu & Xinhua Hu & Astrid Velroyen & Martin Bech & Ming Jiang & Franz Pfeiffer, 2015. "3D Algebraic Iterative Reconstruction for Cone-Beam X-Ray Differential Phase-Contrast Computed Tomography," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Peter B Noël & Bernhard Renger & Martin Fiebich & Daniela Münzel & Alexander A Fingerle & Ernst J Rummeny & Martin Dobritz, 2013. "Does Iterative Reconstruction Lower CT Radiation Dose: Evaluation of 15,000 Examinations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-1, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0184217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.