IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0183872.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social interactions promote adaptive resource defense in ants

Author

Listed:
  • Christoph Johannes Kleineidam
  • Eva Linda Heeb
  • Stefanie Neupert

Abstract

Social insects vigorously defend their nests against con- and heterospecific competitors. Collective defense is also seen at highly profitable food sources. Aggressive responses are elicited or promoted by several means of communication, e.g. alarm pheromones and other chemical markings. In this study, we demonstrate that the social environment and interactions among colony members (nestmates) modulates the propensity to engage in aggressive behavior and therefore plays an important role in allocating workers to a defense task. We kept Formica rufa workers in groups or isolated for different time spans and then tested their aggressiveness in one-on-one encounters with other ants. In groups of more than 20 workers that are freely interacting, individuals are aggressive in one-on-one encounters with non-nestmates, whereas aggressiveness of isolated workers decreases with increasing isolation time. We conclude that ants foraging collectively and interacting frequently, e.g. along foraging trails and at profitable food sources, remain in a social context and thereby maintain high aggressiveness against potential competitors. Our results suggest that the nestmate recognition system can be utilized at remote sites for an adaptive and flexible tuning of the response against competitors.

Suggested Citation

  • Christoph Johannes Kleineidam & Eva Linda Heeb & Stefanie Neupert, 2017. "Social interactions promote adaptive resource defense in ants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-16, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0183872
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183872
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183872
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0183872&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0183872?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael J. Greene & Deborah M. Gordon, 2003. "Cuticular hydrocarbons inform task decisions," Nature, Nature, vol. 423(6935), pages 32-32, May.
    2. Philip S. Newey & Simon K.A. Robson & Ross H. Crozier, 2010. "Know thine enemy: why some weaver ants do but others do not," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 21(2), pages 381-386.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0183872. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.