IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0182341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study

Author

Listed:
  • Chulyong Park
  • Mo-Yeol Kang
  • Dohyung Kim
  • Jaechan Park
  • Huisu Eom
  • Eun-A Kim

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate incidence and distribution of major adverse reproductive health problems related to various kinds of industries in Korea and to compare risks for major reproductive outcomes to assess maternal health in working and non-working women. Methods: We requested claim data from the Korean National Health Insurance. We defined reference groups as (1) non-working women and (2) workers in the education field. Women working in each industry were compared with reference groups regarding rates of miscarriage, threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis, and age and income adjustment was performed. Results: The percentages of all adverse obstetric outcomes were higher in working women than in non-working women. Working women had higher and statistically significant adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for miscarriage in 18 of the 21 industries. The age and income-adjusted OR for miscarriage for all working women was 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.23–1.28). Business facilities management and business support services, manufacturing, human health and social work activities, wholesale and retail trade, and professional, scientific, and technical activities were major industries with higher adjusted ORs for adverse obstetric outcomes. Conclusions: We confirmed that compared to non-working women, working women have a higher risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thus, adverse pregnancy outcomes such as threatened abortion, preterm labor, and intrauterine growth restriction may be associated with working status. This exploratory study identified several industries where in-depth studies are required in future to improve occupational safety in women of reproductive age.

Suggested Citation

  • Chulyong Park & Mo-Yeol Kang & Dohyung Kim & Jaechan Park & Huisu Eom & Eun-A Kim, 2017. "Prevalence of abortion and adverse pregnancy outcomes among working women in Korea: A cross-sectional study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182341
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182341
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182341&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0182341?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inah Kim & Myoung-Hee Kim & Sinye Lim, 2015. "Reproductive Hazards Still Persist in the Microelectronics Industry: Increased Risk of Spontaneous Abortion and Menstrual Aberration among Female Workers in the Microelectronics Industry in South Kore," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-10, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kyungsik Kim & Ho Kyung Sung & Kwan Lee & Sue K. Park, 2019. "Semiconductor Work and the Risk of Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kyungsik Kim & Ho Kyung Sung & Kwan Lee & Sue K. Park, 2019. "Semiconductor Work and the Risk of Spontaneous Abortion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.