IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0182201.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Dispositional Flow: Validity and reliability of the Dispositional Flow State Scale 2, Italian version

Author

Listed:
  • Eleonora F M Riva
  • Giuseppe Riva
  • Cosimo Talò
  • Marco Boffi
  • Nicola Rainisio
  • Linda Pola
  • Barbara Diana
  • Daniela Villani
  • Luca Argenton
  • Paolo Inghilleri

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Dispositional Flow Scale-2 (DFS-2), for use with Italian adults, young adults and adolescents. Method: In accordance with the guidelines for test adaptation, the scale has been translated with the method of back translation. The understanding of the item has been checked according to the latest standards on the culturally sensitive translation. The scale thus produced was administered to 843 individuals (of which 60.69% female), between the ages of 15 and 74. The sample is balanced between workers and students. The main activities defined by the subjects allow the sample to be divided into three categories: students, workers, athletes (professionals and semi-professionals). Results: The confirmatory factor analysis, conducted using the Maximum Likelihood Estimator (MLM), showed acceptable fit indexes. Reliability and validity have been verified, and structural invariance has been verified on 6 categories of Flow experience and for 3 subsamples with different with different fields of action. Correlational analysis shows significant high values between the nine dimensions. Conclusions: Our data confirmed the validity and reliability of the Italian DFS-2 in measuring Flow experiences. The scale is reliable for use with Italian adults, young adults and adolescents. The Italian version of the scale is suitable for the evaluation of the subjective tendency to experience Flow trait characteristic in different contest, as sport, study and work.

Suggested Citation

  • Eleonora F M Riva & Giuseppe Riva & Cosimo Talò & Marco Boffi & Nicola Rainisio & Linda Pola & Barbara Diana & Daniela Villani & Luca Argenton & Paolo Inghilleri, 2017. "Measuring Dispositional Flow: Validity and reliability of the Dispositional Flow State Scale 2, Italian version," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-15, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182201
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182201
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0182201&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0182201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0182201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.