IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0180294.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Physician communication coaching effects on patient experience

Author

Listed:
  • Adrianne Seiler
  • Alexander Knee
  • Reham Shaaban
  • Christine Bryson
  • Jasmine Paadam
  • Rohini Harvey
  • Satoko Igarashi
  • Christopher LaChance
  • Evan Benjamin
  • Tara Lagu

Abstract

Background: Excellent communication is a necessary component of high-quality health care. We aimed to determine whether a training module could improve patients’ perceptions of physician communication behaviors, as measured by change over time in domains of patient experience scores related to physician communication. Study design: We designed a comprehensive physician-training module focused on improving specific “etiquette-based” physician communication skills through standardized simulations and physician coaching with structured feedback. We employed a quasi-experimental pre-post design, with an intervention group consisting of internal medicine hospitalists and residents and a control group consisting of surgeons. The outcome was percent “always” scores for questions related to patients’ perceptions of physician communication using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and a Non-HCAHPS Physician-Specific Patient Experience Survey (NHPPES) administered to patients cared for by hospitalists. Results: A total of 128 physicians participated in the simulation. Responses from 5020 patients were analyzed using HCAHPS survey data and 1990 patients using NHPPES survey data. The intercept shift, or the degree of change from pre-intervention percent “always” responses, for the HCAHPS questions of doctors “treating patients with courtesy” “explaining things in a way patients could understand,” and “overall teamwork” showed no significant differences between surgical control and hospitalist intervention patients. Adjusted NHPPES percent excellent survey results increased significantly post-intervention for the questions of specified individual doctors “keeping patient informed” (adjusted intercept shift 9.9% P = 0.019), “overall teamwork” (adjusted intercept shift 11%, P = 0.037), and “using words the patient could understand” (adjusted intercept shift 14.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusion: A simulation based physician communication coaching method focused on specific “etiquette-based” communication behaviors through a deliberate practice framework was not associated with significantly improved HCAHPS physician communication patient experience scores. Further research could reveal ways that this model affects patients’ perceptions of physician communication relating to specific physicians or behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Adrianne Seiler & Alexander Knee & Reham Shaaban & Christine Bryson & Jasmine Paadam & Rohini Harvey & Satoko Igarashi & Christopher LaChance & Evan Benjamin & Tara Lagu, 2017. "Physician communication coaching effects on patient experience," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180294
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180294
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180294
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0180294&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0180294?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0180294. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.