IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0179581.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioinformatic training needs at a health sciences campus

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey C Oliver

Abstract

Background: Health sciences research is increasingly focusing on big data applications, such as genomic technologies and precision medicine, to address key issues in human health. These approaches rely on biological data repositories and bioinformatic analyses, both of which are growing rapidly in size and scope. Libraries play a key role in supporting researchers in navigating these and other information resources. Methods: With the goal of supporting bioinformatics research in the health sciences, the University of Arizona Health Sciences Library established a Bioinformation program. To shape the support provided by the library, I developed and administered a needs assessment survey to the University of Arizona Health Sciences campus in Tucson, Arizona. The survey was designed to identify the training topics of interest to health sciences researchers and the preferred modes of training. Results: Survey respondents expressed an interest in a broad array of potential training topics, including "traditional" information seeking as well as interest in analytical training. Of particular interest were training in transcriptomic tools and the use of databases linking genotypes and phenotypes. Staff were most interested in bioinformatics training topics, while faculty were the least interested. Hands-on workshops were significantly preferred over any other mode of training. The University of Arizona Health Sciences Library is meeting those needs through internal programming and external partnerships. Conclusion: The results of the survey demonstrate a keen interest in a variety of bioinformatic resources; the challenge to the library is how to address those training needs. The mode of support depends largely on library staff expertise in the numerous subject-specific databases and tools. Librarian-led bioinformatic training sessions provide opportunities for engagement with researchers at multiple points of the research life cycle. When training needs exceed library capacity, partnering with intramural and extramural units will be crucial in library support of health sciences bioinformatic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey C Oliver, 2017. "Bioinformatic training needs at a health sciences campus," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179581
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179581
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179581
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0179581&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0179581?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Allegra Via & Javier De Las Rivas & Teresa K Attwood & David Landsman & Michelle D Brazas & Jack A M Leunissen & Anna Tramontano & Maria Victoria Schneider, 2011. "Ten Simple Rules for Developing a Short Bioinformatics Training Course," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(10), pages 1-3, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Teresa K Atwood & Erik Bongcam-Rudloff & Michelle E Brazas & Manuel Corpas & Pascale Gaudet & Fran Lewitter & Nicola Mulder & Patricia M Palagi & Maria Victoria Schneider & Celia W G van Gelder & GOBL, 2015. "GOBLET: The Global Organisation for Bioinformatics Learning, Education and Training," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-10, April.
    2. Alise Ponsero & Ryan Bartelme & Gustavo de Oliveira Almeida & Alex Bigelow & Reetu Tuteja & Holly Ellingson & Tyson Swetnam & Nirav Merchant & Maliaca Oxnam & Eric Lyons, 2020. "Ten simple rules for organizing a data science workshop," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(10), pages 1-7, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0179581. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.