IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178982.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease

Author

Listed:
  • Boris Hayete
  • Diane Wuest
  • Jason Laramie
  • Paul McDonagh
  • Bruce Church
  • Shirley Eberly
  • Anthony Lang
  • Kenneth Marek
  • Karl Runge
  • Ira Shoulson
  • Andrew Singleton
  • Caroline Tanner
  • Iya Khalil
  • Ajay Verma
  • Bernard Ravina

Abstract

Background: There are few established predictors of the clinical course of PD. Prognostic markers would be useful for clinical care and research. Objective: To identify predictors of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes and rate of progression in PD. Methods: Newly diagnosed PD participants were followed for 7 years in a prospective study, conducted at 55 centers in the United States and Canada. Analyses were conducted in 244 participants with complete demographic, clinical, genetic, and dopamine transporter imaging data. Machine learning dynamic Bayesian graphical models were used to identify and simulate predictors and outcomes. The outcomes rate of cognition changes are assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, and rate of motor changes are assessed by UPDRS part-III. Results: The most robust and consistent longitudinal predictors of cognitive function included older age, baseline Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) parts I and II, Schwab and England activities of daily living scale, striatal dopamine transporter binding, and SNP rs11724635 in the gene BST1. The most consistent predictor of UPDRS part III was baseline level of activities of daily living (part II). Key findings were replicated using long-term data from an independent cohort study. Conclusions: Baseline function near the time of Parkinson’s disease diagnosis, as measured by activities of daily living, is a consistent predictor of long-term motor and cognitive outcomes. Additional predictors identified may further characterize the expected course of Parkinson’s disease and suggest mechanisms underlying disease progression. The prognostic model developed in this study can be used to simulate the effects of the prognostic variables on motor and cognitive outcomes, and can be replicated and refined with data from independent longitudinal studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Boris Hayete & Diane Wuest & Jason Laramie & Paul McDonagh & Bruce Church & Shirley Eberly & Anthony Lang & Kenneth Marek & Karl Runge & Ira Shoulson & Andrew Singleton & Caroline Tanner & Iya Khalil , 2017. "A Bayesian mathematical model of motor and cognitive outcomes in Parkinson’s disease," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178982
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178982
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178982
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178982&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178982?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178982. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.