IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178782.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chronotypes in the US – Influence of age and sex

Author

Listed:
  • Dorothee Fischer
  • David A Lombardi
  • Helen Marucci-Wellman
  • Till Roenneberg

Abstract

An individual’s chronotype reflects how the circadian system embeds itself into the 24-h day with rhythms in physiology, cognition and behavior occurring accordingly earlier or later. In view of an increasing number of people working at unusual times and linked health and safety risks, the wide range in human chronotypes may provide opportunities to allow people to work (and sleep) at times that are in synch with their circadian physiology. We aimed at estimating the distribution of chronotypes in the US population by age and sex. Twelve years (2003–2014) of pooled diary data from the American Time Use Survey were used to calculate chronotype based on mid-point of sleep on weekends (MSFWe, n = 53,689). We observed a near-normal distribution overall and within each age group. The distribution’s mean value is systematically different with age, shifting later during adolescence, showing a peak in ‘lateness’ at ~19 years, and shifting earlier thereafter. Men are typically later chronotypes than women before 40, but earlier types after 40. The greatest differences are observed between 15 and 25 for both sexes, equaling more than 50% of the total chronotype difference across all age groups. The variability in chronotype decreases with age, but is generally higher in males than females. This is the first study to estimate the distribution and prevalence of individual chronotypes in the US population based on a large-scale, nationally representative sample. Our finding that adolescents are on average the latest chronotypes supports delaying school start times to benefit their sleep and circadian alignment. The generally wide range in chronotypes may provide opportunities for tailored work schedules by matching external and internal time, potentially decreasing long- and short-term health and safety risks.

Suggested Citation

  • Dorothee Fischer & David A Lombardi & Helen Marucci-Wellman & Till Roenneberg, 2017. "Chronotypes in the US – Influence of age and sex," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178782
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178782
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178782
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178782&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178782?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kinne, S. & Patrick, D.L. & Doyle, D.L., 2004. "Prevalence of Secondary Conditions among People with Disabilities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(3), pages 443-445.
    2. Stephanie J Crowley & Eliza Van Reen & Monique K LeBourgeois & Christine Acebo & Leila Tarokh & Ronald Seifer & David H Barker & Mary A Carskadon, 2014. "A Longitudinal Assessment of Sleep Timing, Circadian Phase, and Phase Angle of Entrainment across Human Adolescence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marja Eliisa Holm & Päivi Sainio & Jaana Suvisaari & Katri Sääksjärvi & Tuija Jääskeläinen & Suvi Parikka & Seppo Koskinen, 2022. "Differences in Unfavorable Lifestyle Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic between People with and without Disabilities in Finland: Psychological Distress as a Mediator," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Michael Jones & John Morris & Frank Deruyter, 2018. "Mobile Healthcare and People with Disabilities: Current State and Future Needs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, March.
    3. James H. Rimmer, 2022. "Addressing Disability Inequities: Let’s Stop Admiring the Problem and Do Something about It," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Sandie Ha & Valerie Martinez, 2021. "Associations between Disability and Infertility among U.S. Reproductive-Aged Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-12, March.
    5. Erin Radcliffe & Ben Lippincott & Raeda Anderson & Mike Jones, 2021. "A Pilot Evaluation of mHealth App Accessibility for Three Top-Rated Weight Management Apps by People with Disabilities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-14, April.
    6. Mike Jones & Frank DeRuyter & John Morris, 2020. "The Digital Health Revolution and People with Disabilities: Perspective from the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.
    7. Hannah Kuper & Tracey Smythe & Antony Duttine, 2018. "Reflections on Health Promotion and Disability in Low and Middle-Income Countries: Case Study of Parent-Support Programmes for Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-9, March.
    8. Youngin Won, 2022. "Identification of Health Characteristics of People with Physical Disability by Applying the PRECEDE Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-19, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178782. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.