IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178777.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biliary drainage improves the predictive value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Scores in inoperable pancreatic cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Chikara Iino
  • Tadashi Shimoyama
  • Takasato Igarashi
  • Tomoyuki Aihara
  • Kentaro Ishii
  • Juichi Sakamoto
  • Hiroshi Tono
  • Shinsaku Fukuda

Abstract

Objective: To assess the influence of biliary drainage to cholangitis on modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: mGPS was calculated before and after biliary drainage in 47 consecutive patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer who were receiving chemotherapy. Biliary drainage was indicated for malignant obstructive jaundice that prevented the administration of chemotherapy. To elucidate mGPS values, serum levels of CRP and albumin were measured at the time of diagnosis (before biliary drainage). Overall survival was evaluated and risk factors, which contribute to overall survival, were examined. Results: Biliary drainage was performed in 15 patients. Using values obtained before biliary drainage, there were no significant differences in median survival time between patients with a mGPS of 0 and those with a mGPS of 1 or 2 (10.7 vs. 9.4 months; p = 0.757). However, using values obtained after biliary drainage, median survival time was significantly higher in patients with a mGPS of 0 than in those with a mGPS of 1 or 2 (11.4 vs. 4.7 months; p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis revealed that a mGPS of 1 or 2 (HR: 3.38; 95% CI: 1.35–8.46, p = 0.009), a carbohydrate antigen 19–9 >1000 U/mL (2.52; 1.22–5.23, p = 0.013), a performance status of 2 (7.68; 2.72–21.28, p = 0.001), carcinoembryonic antigen level >10 ng/mL (2.29; 1.13–4.61, p = 0.021) were independently associated with overall survival. Conclusion: mGPS values obtained after biliary drainage appear to be a more reliable indicator of overall survival in patients with inoperable pancreatic cancer.

Suggested Citation

  • Chikara Iino & Tadashi Shimoyama & Takasato Igarashi & Tomoyuki Aihara & Kentaro Ishii & Juichi Sakamoto & Hiroshi Tono & Shinsaku Fukuda, 2017. "Biliary drainage improves the predictive value of modified Glasgow Prognostic Scores in inoperable pancreatic cancer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-7, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178777
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178777
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178777&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178777. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.