IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178726.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bringing functional status into a big data world: Validation of national Veterans Affairs functional status data

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca T Brown
  • Kiya D Komaiko
  • Ying Shi
  • Kathy Z Fung
  • W John Boscardin
  • Alvin Au-Yeung
  • Gary Tarasovsky
  • Riya Jacob
  • Michael A Steinman

Abstract

Background: The ability to perform basic daily activities (“functional status”) is key to older adults’ quality of life and strongly predicts health outcomes. However, data on functional status are seldom collected during routine clinical care in a way that makes them available for clinical use and research. Objectives: To validate functional status data that Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers recently started collecting during routine clinical care, compared to the same data collected in a structured research setting. Design: Prospective validation study. Setting: Seven VA medical centers that collected complete data on 5 activities of daily living (ADLs) and 8 instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) from older patients attending primary care appointments. Participants: Randomly selected patients aged 75 and older who had new ADL and IADL data collected during a primary care appointment (N = 252). We oversampled patients with ADL dependence and applied these sampling weights to our analyses. Measurements: Telephone-based interviews using a validated measure to assess the same 5 ADLs and 8 IADLs. Results: Mean age was 83 years, 96% were male, and 75% were white. Of 85 participants whom VA data identified as dependent in 1 or more ADLs, 74 (87%) reported being dependent by interview; of 167 whom VA data identified as independent in ADLs, 149 (89%) reported being independent. The sample-weighted sensitivity of the VA data for identifying ADL dependence was 45% (95% CI, 29%, 62%) compared to the reference standard, the specificity was 99% (95% CI, 99%, >99%), and the positive predictive value was 87% (95% CI, 79%, 93%). The weighted kappa statistic was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41, 0.68) for the agreement between VA data and research-collected data in identifying ADL dependence. Conclusion: Overall agreement of VA functional status data with a reference standard was moderate, with fair sensitivity but high specificity and positive predictive value.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca T Brown & Kiya D Komaiko & Ying Shi & Kathy Z Fung & W John Boscardin & Alvin Au-Yeung & Gary Tarasovsky & Riya Jacob & Michael A Steinman, 2017. "Bringing functional status into a big data world: Validation of national Veterans Affairs functional status data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178726
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178726
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178726
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178726&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178726?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.