IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0178085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing the PHMRC shortened questionnaire: Survey duration of open and closed questions in three sites

Author

Listed:
  • Abraham D Flaxman
  • Andrea Stewart
  • Jonathan C Joseph
  • Nurul Alam
  • Saidul Alam
  • Hafizur Chowdhury
  • Saman Gamage
  • Hebe Gouda
  • Rohina Joshi
  • Marilla Lucero
  • Meghan D Mooney
  • Devarsetty Praveen
  • Rasika Rampatige
  • Hazel Remolador
  • Diozele Sanvictores
  • Peter T Serina
  • Peter Kim Streatfield
  • Veronica Tallo
  • Nandalal Wijesekera
  • Christopher J L Murray
  • Bernardo Hernandez
  • Alan D Lopez
  • Ian Douglas Riley

Abstract

Background: More countries are using verbal autopsy as a part of routine mortality surveillance. The length of time required to complete a verbal autopsy interview is a key logistical consideration for planning large-scale surveillance. Methods: We use the PHMRC shortened questionnaire to conduct verbal autopsy interviews at three sites and collect data on the length of time required to complete the interview. This instrument uses a novel checklist of keywords to capture relevant information from the open response. The open response section is timed separately from the section consisting of closed questions. Results: We found the median time to complete the entire interview was approximately 25 minutes and did not vary substantially by age-specific module. The median time for the open response section was approximately 4 minutes and 60% of interviewees mentioned at least one keyword within the open response section. Conclusions: The length of time required to complete the interview was short enough for large-scale routine use. The open-response section did not add a substantial amount of time and provided useful information which can be used to increase the accuracy of the predictions of the cause of death. The novel checklist approach further reduces the burden of transcribing and translating a large amount of free text. This makes the PHMRC instrument ideal for national mortality surveillance.

Suggested Citation

  • Abraham D Flaxman & Andrea Stewart & Jonathan C Joseph & Nurul Alam & Saidul Alam & Hafizur Chowdhury & Saman Gamage & Hebe Gouda & Rohina Joshi & Marilla Lucero & Meghan D Mooney & Devarsetty Praveen, 2017. "Implementing the PHMRC shortened questionnaire: Survey duration of open and closed questions in three sites," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-12, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178085
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178085
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0178085&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0178085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0178085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.