IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0177996.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Validity and responsiveness of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing physical activity during pregnancy

Author

Listed:
  • Estelle D Watson
  • Lisa K Micklesfield
  • Mireille N M van Poppel
  • Shane A Norris
  • Matteo C Sattler
  • Pavel Dietz

Abstract

The physiological and biomechanical changes that occur during pregnancy make accurate measurement of physical activity (PA) a challenge during this unique period. The Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) has been used extensively in low-to-middle income countries, but has never been validated in a pregnant population. In this longitudinal study, 95 pregnant women (mean age: 29.5±5.7 years; BMI: 26.9±5.0 kg/m2) completed the GPAQ and were asked to wear an accelerometer for 7 days at two time points during pregnancy (14–18 and 29–33 weeks gestation). There was a significant difference between accelerometry and GPAQ when measuring moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 29–33 weeks gestation (16.6 vs 21.4 min/day; p = 0.02) as well as sedentary behaviour (SB) at both 14–18 weeks (457.0 vs 300 min/day; p

Suggested Citation

  • Estelle D Watson & Lisa K Micklesfield & Mireille N M van Poppel & Shane A Norris & Matteo C Sattler & Pavel Dietz, 2017. "Validity and responsiveness of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ) in assessing physical activity during pregnancy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177996
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177996
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177996
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177996&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0177996?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lambed Tatah & Matthew Pearce & Rahul Goel & Soren Brage & James Woodcock & Fidelia A. A. Dake, 2022. "Physical Activity Behaviour and Comparison of GPAQ and Travel Diary Transport-Related Physical Activity in Accra, Ghana," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-13, June.
    2. Raquel Rodríguez-Blanque & María José Aguilar-Cordero & Ana Eugenia Marín-Jiménez & María José Menor-Rodríguez & Maria Montiel-Troya & Juan Carlos Sánchez-García, 2020. "Water Exercise and Quality of Life in Pregnancy: A Randomised Clinical Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Tom Deliens & Vickà Versele & Jasper Jehin & Eva D’Hondt & Yanni Verhavert & Peter Clarys & Roland Devlieger & Annick Bogaerts & Dirk Aerenhouts, 2021. "Misreporting of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in Parents-to-Be: A Validation Study across Sex," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Xiaofen D. Keating & Ke Zhou & Xiaolu Liu & Michael Hodges & Jingwen Liu & Jianmin Guan & Ashley Phelps & Jose Castro-Piñero, 2019. "Reliability and Concurrent Validity of Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ): A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-27, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177996. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.