IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0177616.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development of the “Highly Sensitive Dog” questionnaire to evaluate the personality dimension “Sensory Processing Sensitivity” in dogs

Author

Listed:
  • Maya Braem
  • Lucy Asher
  • Sibylle Furrer
  • Isabel Lechner
  • Hanno Würbel
  • Luca Melotti

Abstract

In humans, the personality dimension ‘sensory processing sensitivity (SPS)’, also referred to as “high sensitivity”, involves deeper processing of sensory information, which can be associated with physiological and behavioral overarousal. However, it has not been studied up to now whether this dimension also exists in other species. SPS can influence how people perceive the environment and how this affects them, thus a similar dimension in animals would be highly relevant with respect to animal welfare. We therefore explored whether SPS translates to dogs, one of the primary model species in personality research. A 32-item questionnaire to assess the “highly sensitive dog score” (HSD-s) was developed based on the “highly sensitive person” (HSP) questionnaire. A large-scale, international online survey was conducted, including the HSD questionnaire, as well as questions on fearfulness, neuroticism, “demographic” (e.g. dog sex, age, weight; age at adoption, etc.) and “human” factors (e.g. owner age, sex, profession, communication style, etc.), and the HSP questionnaire. Data were analyzed using linear mixed effect models with forward stepwise selection to test prediction of HSD-s by the above-mentioned factors, with country of residence and dog breed treated as random effects. A total of 3647 questionnaires were fully completed. HSD-, fearfulness, neuroticism and HSP-scores showed good internal consistencies, and HSD-s only moderately correlated with fearfulness and neuroticism scores, paralleling previous findings in humans. Intra- (N = 447) and inter-rater (N = 120) reliabilities were good. Demographic and human factors, including HSP score, explained only a small amount of the variance of HSD-s. A PCA analysis identified three subtraits of SPS, comparable to human findings. Overall, the measured personality dimension in dogs showed good internal consistency, partial independence from fearfulness and neuroticism, and good intra- and inter-rater reliability, indicating good construct validity of the HSD questionnaire. Human and demographic factors only marginally affected the HSD-s suggesting that, as hypothesized for human SPS, a genetic basis may underlie this dimension within the dog species.

Suggested Citation

  • Maya Braem & Lucy Asher & Sibylle Furrer & Isabel Lechner & Hanno Würbel & Luca Melotti, 2017. "Development of the “Highly Sensitive Dog” questionnaire to evaluate the personality dimension “Sensory Processing Sensitivity” in dogs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-25, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177616
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177616
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177616&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0177616?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Max Wolf & G. Sander van Doorn & Olof Leimar & Franz J. Weissing, 2007. "Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities," Nature, Nature, vol. 447(7144), pages 581-584, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Joachim G Frommen & Timo Thünken & Francesca Santostefano & Valentina Balzarini & Attila Hettyey, 2022. "Effects of chronic and acute predation risk on sexual ornamentation and mating preferences [Effects of perceived predation risk and social environment on the development of three-spined stickleback," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 33(1), pages 7-16.
    2. Gabrielle Dubuc-Messier & Denis Réale & Philippe Perret & Anne Charmantier, 2017. "Environmental heterogeneity and population differences in blue tits personality traits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 448-459.
    3. Jamie Dunning & Terry Burke & Alex Hoi Hang Chan & Heung Ying Janet Chik & Tim Evans & Julia Schroeder, 2023. "Opposite-sex associations are linked with annual fitness, but sociality is stable over lifetime," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 315-324.
    4. Sarah Senécal & Alexia Mouchet & Niels J Dingemanse, 2021. "Life-history trade-offs, density, lay date—not personality—explain multibroodedness in great tits," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1114-1126.
    5. Lenka Soták-Benedeková & Jana Rybárová & Dana Tometzová & Andrea Seňová & Radim Rybár, 2025. "Comprehensive Analysis of Rural Tourism Development: Historical Evolution, Current Trends, and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-41, January.
    6. Carin Magnhagen & Sebastian Wacker & Elisabet Forsgren & Lise Cats Myhre & Elizabeth Espy & Trond Amundsen, 2014. "Context Consistency and Seasonal Variation in Boldness of Male Two-Spotted Gobies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-10, March.
    7. Arbilly, Michal & Motro, Uzi & Feldman, Marcus W. & Lotem, Arnon, 2011. "Recombination and the evolution of coordinated phenotypic expression in a frequency-dependent game," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(4), pages 244-255.
    8. Matthew H T Chan & Peter S Kim, 2014. "An Age-Structured Approach to Modelling Behavioural Variation Maintained by Life-History Trade-Offs," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, January.
    9. Mark Briffa & Julie Greenaway, 2011. "High In Situ Repeatability of Behaviour Indicates Animal Personality in the Beadlet Anemone Actinia equina (Cnidaria)," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    10. Farid Anvari & Stephan Billinger & Pantelis P. Analytis & Vithor Rosa Franco & Davide Marchiori, 2024. "Testing the convergent validity, domain generality, and temporal stability of selected measures of people’s tendency to explore," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.
    11. Jamie L Fratkin & David L Sinn & Erika A Patall & Samuel D Gosling, 2013. "Personality Consistency in Dogs: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    12. Christian Hilbe & Maria Kleshnina & Kateřina Staňková, 2023. "Evolutionary Games and Applications: Fifty Years of ‘The Logic of Animal Conflict’," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 1035-1048, December.
    13. László Zsolt Garamszegi & Magdalena Zagalska-Neubauer & David Canal & Gábor Markó & Eszter Szász & Sándor Zsebők & Eszter Szöllősi & Gábor Herczeg & János Török, 2015. "Malaria parasites, immune challenge, MHC variability, and predator avoidance in a passerine bird," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1292-1302.
    14. Gonzalo Rodríguez-Ruiz & Jesús Ortega & Pilar López & Alfredo Salvador & José Martín, 2021. "Improved nutritional status may promote an “asset protection” reproductive strategy in male rock lizards," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 32(6), pages 1276-1284.
    15. Wolfgang Kuhle, 2015. "Darwinian Adverse Selection," Papers 1507.04934, arXiv.org.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.