IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0177303.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in refractory ascites: Post-marketing surveillance results

Author

Listed:
  • Norio Hanafusa
  • Ayako Isoai
  • Tomoaki Ishihara
  • Tetsuya Inoue
  • Ken Ishitani
  • Taiju Utsugisawa
  • Toshihiko Yamaka
  • Tetsuya Ito
  • Hiroshi Sugiyama
  • Atsushi Arakawa
  • Yosuke Yamada
  • Yasuo Itano
  • Hirokazu Onodera
  • Ryosuke Kobayashi
  • Naoko Torii
  • Toyoko Numata
  • Taihei Kashiwabara
  • Yoshihiro Matsuno
  • Michio Kato

Abstract

We performed post-marketing surveillance to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART). In total, 356 CART sessions in 147 patients at 22 centers were performed. The most common primary disease was cancer (128 cases, 300 sessions). Mean amount of ascites collected was 3.7 L, and mean concentration ratio was 9.2. Mean amount of reinfused protein was 67.8 g (recovery rate, 72.0%). Performance status, dietary intake, urine volume, body weight and abdominal circumference were significantly improved after CART. Body temperature increased significantly, by 0.3°C on average. Concomitant steroids and/or NSAIDs use before reinfusion was significantly and negatively associated with increases in body temperature. Most adverse events were fever and chills. This study examined a large number of patients compared with previous studies, and showed that CART is an effective and relatively safe treatment for refractory ascites, such as malignant ascites.

Suggested Citation

  • Norio Hanafusa & Ayako Isoai & Tomoaki Ishihara & Tetsuya Inoue & Ken Ishitani & Taiju Utsugisawa & Toshihiko Yamaka & Tetsuya Ito & Hiroshi Sugiyama & Atsushi Arakawa & Yosuke Yamada & Yasuo Itano & , 2017. "Safety and efficacy of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) in refractory ascites: Post-marketing surveillance results," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177303
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177303
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177303
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0177303&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0177303?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0177303. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.