IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176472.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review

Author

Listed:
  • Tamara Hoppenbrouwers
  • Anouchska S A Autar
  • Andi R Sultan
  • Tsion E Abraham
  • Wiggert A van Cappellen
  • Adriaan B Houtsmuller
  • Willem J B van Wamel
  • Heleen M M van Beusekom
  • Johan W van Neck
  • Moniek P M de Maat

Abstract

Background: Multiple inducers of in vitro Neutrophil Extracellular Trap (NET) formation (NETosis) have been described. Since there is much variation in study design and results, our aim was to create a systematic review of NETosis inducers and perform a standardized in vitro study of NETosis inducers important in (cardiac) wound healing. Methods: In vitro NETosis was studied by incubating neutrophils with PMA, living and dead bacteria (S. aureus and E. coli), LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant), glucose and calcium ionophore Ionomycin using 3-hour periods of time-lapse confocal imaging. Results: PMA is a consistent and potent inducer of NETosis. Ionomycin also consistently resulted in extrusion of DNA, albeit with a process that differs from the NETosis process induced by PMA. In our standardized experiments, living bacteria were also potent inducers of NETosis, but dead bacteria, LPS, (activated) platelets (supernatant) and glucose did not induce NETosis. Conclusion: Our systematic review confirms that there is much variation in study design and results of NETosis induction. Our experimental results confirm that under standardized conditions, PMA, living bacteria and Ionomycin all strongly induce NETosis, but real-time confocal imaging reveal different courses of events.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamara Hoppenbrouwers & Anouchska S A Autar & Andi R Sultan & Tsion E Abraham & Wiggert A van Cappellen & Adriaan B Houtsmuller & Willem J B van Wamel & Heleen M M van Beusekom & Johan W van Neck & Mo, 2017. "In vitro induction of NETosis: Comprehensive live imaging comparison and systematic review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-29, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176472
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176472
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176472
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176472&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176472?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176472. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.