IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0176275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Initial assessment of the infant with neonatal cholestasis—Is this biliary atresia?

Author

Listed:
  • Benjamin L Shneider
  • Jeff Moore
  • Nanda Kerkar
  • John C Magee
  • Wen Ye
  • Saul J Karpen
  • Binita M Kamath
  • Jean P Molleston
  • Jorge A Bezerra
  • Karen F Murray
  • Kathleen M Loomes
  • Peter F Whitington
  • Philip Rosenthal
  • Robert H Squires
  • Stephen L Guthery
  • Ronen Arnon
  • Kathleen B Schwarz
  • Yumirle P Turmelle
  • Averell H Sherker
  • Ronald J Sokol
  • for the Childhood Liver Disease Research Network

Abstract

Introduction: Optimizing outcome in biliary atresia (BA) requires timely diagnosis. Cholestasis is a presenting feature of BA, as well as other diagnoses (Non-BA). Identification of clinical features of neonatal cholestasis that would expedite decisions to pursue subsequent invasive testing to correctly diagnose or exclude BA would enhance outcomes. The analytical goal was to develop a predictive model for BA using data available at initial presentation. Methods: Infants at presentation with neonatal cholestasis (direct/conjugated bilirubin >2 mg/dl [34.2 μM]) were enrolled prior to surgical exploration in a prospective observational multi-centered study (PROBE–NCT00061828). Clinical features (physical findings, laboratory results, gallbladder sonography) at enrollment were analyzed. Initially, 19 features were selected as candidate predictors. Two approaches were used to build models for diagnosis prediction: a hierarchical classification and regression decision tree (CART) and a logistic regression model using a stepwise selection strategy. Results: In PROBE April 2004-February 2014, 401 infants met criteria for BA and 259 for Non-BA. Univariate analysis identified 13 features that were significantly different between BA and Non-BA. Using a CART predictive model of BA versus Non-BA (significant factors: gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, acholic stools, weight), the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC AUC) was 0.83. Twelve percent of BA infants were misclassified as Non-BA; 17% of Non-BA infants were misclassified as BA. Stepwise logistic regression identified seven factors in a predictive model (ROC AUC 0.89). Using this model, a predicted probability of >0.8 (n = 357) yielded an 81% true positive rate for BA;

Suggested Citation

  • Benjamin L Shneider & Jeff Moore & Nanda Kerkar & John C Magee & Wen Ye & Saul J Karpen & Binita M Kamath & Jean P Molleston & Jorge A Bezerra & Karen F Murray & Kathleen M Loomes & Peter F Whitington, 2017. "Initial assessment of the infant with neonatal cholestasis—Is this biliary atresia?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-15, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176275
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176275
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0176275&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0176275?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0176275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.