IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0173461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A stillbirth calculator: Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model to quantify stillbirth risk

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda S Trudell
  • Methodius G Tuuli
  • Graham A Colditz
  • George A Macones
  • Anthony O Odibo

Abstract

Objective: To generate a clinical prediction tool for stillbirth that combines maternal risk factors to provide an evidence based approach for the identification of women who will benefit most from antenatal testing for stillbirth prevention. Design: Retrospective cohort study Setting: Midwestern United States quaternary referral center Population: Singleton pregnancies undergoing second trimester anatomic survey from 1999–2009. Pregnancies with incomplete follow-up were excluded. Methods: Candidate predictors were identified from the literature and univariate analysis. Backward stepwise logistic regression with statistical comparison of model discrimination, calibration and clinical performance was used to generate final models for the prediction of stillbirth. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping with 1,000 repetitions. A stillbirth risk calculator and stillbirth risk score were developed for the prediction of stillbirth at or beyond 32 weeks excluding fetal anomalies and aneuploidy. Statistical and clinical cut-points were identified and the tools compared using the Integrated Discrimination Improvement. Main outcome measures: Antepartum stillbirth Results: 64,173 women met inclusion criteria. The final stillbirth risk calculator and score included maternal age, black race, nulliparity, body mass index, smoking, chronic hypertension and pre-gestational diabetes. The stillbirth calculator and simple risk score demonstrated modest discrimination but clinically significant performance with no difference in overall performance between the tools [(AUC 0.66 95% CI 0.60–0.72) and (AUC 0.64 95% CI 0.58–0.70), (p = 0.25)]. Conclusion: A stillbirth risk score was developed incorporating maternal risk factors easily ascertained during prenatal care to determine an individual woman’s risk for stillbirth and provide an evidenced based approach to the initiation of antenatal testing for the prediction and prevention of stillbirth.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda S Trudell & Methodius G Tuuli & Graham A Colditz & George A Macones & Anthony O Odibo, 2017. "A stillbirth calculator: Development and internal validation of a clinical prediction model to quantify stillbirth risk," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173461
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0173461&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0173461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Brittney M Donovan & Patrick J Breheny & Jennifer G Robinson & Rebecca J Baer & Audrey F Saftlas & Wei Bao & Andrea L Greiner & Knute D Carter & Scott P Oltman & Larry Rand & Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowsk, 2019. "Development and validation of a clinical model for preconception and early pregnancy risk prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus in nulliparous women," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Adi L Tarca & Roberto Romero & Neta Benshalom-Tirosh & Nandor Gabor Than & Dereje W Gudicha & Bogdan Done & Percy Pacora & Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa & Bogdan Panaitescu & Dan Tirosh & Nardhy Gomez-Lope, 2019. "The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-34, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0173461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.